Spend, Spend, Spend perceptions

Allison's dealings were poor but about 30 years later we were slowly getting back on track and then Keegan went bonkers again with the likes of Vuoso, Fowler, Negouai, Sommeil, Macken etc. Loved Keegan first season like big Mal's first spell but they both left a bit of a mess.
 
From BBC.
So Rags, Chelsea and Arsenal have a higher net soend than us over the last decade:

Manchester United have spent a record £1.19bn more on transfers over the past decade than they have recouped through player sales, according to a new study.

Since 2014 United have spent around £1.67bn on new players, and brought in around £481m, says Swiss-based research institute, CIES
Chelsea are second with a negative net spend of £883m, followed by French side Paris St-Germain with £863m.

Arsenal (£745m) and Manchester City (£732m) complete the top five.
It would be interesting to find out what the figures are for the last 15 and twenty years also...I.e. since the takeover and since the move to the etihad.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.