Spuds show us how bad Bobby is .. WTF !!

The word "selective" screams at me reading that tosh.

Thats Dave Kidd added to my blacklist of bullshitters giving personal opinion thinley veiled as genuine journalism.

I don't mind them being anti city but suely fair practice is being stretched to breaking point with some of the crap they write.
 
l






like all the negative shit i believe its making us stronger as a club
 
Dave Kidd is just a biased rag twat, he`s brown nosing the twitcher in case he gets the England job (fuck me i hope he does because he will fuck it up big time).
I would rather have RM over any manager in the Premier league now, i mean old Shakeyhands wont last much longer and AVB at Chelsea is unproven and the twitcher is as bent as they come.
Fuck what the press have to say, we dont need them but they fucking need us. Lets ban any **** that writes anything that is untrue or detrimental about us. CTID
 
I must confess that I too was a little taken aback by that pile of shit masquerading as a piece of journalism.

I can't wait until Bobby actually sorts his man management skills out and we can get some team spirit and discipline in the squad. Given our current record in the absence of those factors, presumably we will be averaging six to seven goals a game at that point. Obviously it would only be three or four against the likes of utd and Chelsea but around the eight or nine goal level every time we play a side in the bottom half.

Sort it out Bobby FFS!! A mere three goals a game is so dull and, frankly, unsatisfactory.
 
this aticle shows the other reason why the media are pushing for us to get rid of tevez...they say we should get rid because he is a disgrace to football etc etc etc...however aat the end of the article they give themselves away suggesting that the tevz camp may have noticed how twitchy is able to manage players that Mancini hasntnt been able to.....the media are desperate to weaken us (and regardless of what you think of tevez it is a fact that ew have weaker options without him)....but they also want to strengthen one of our rivals which tevez would undoubtedly do if he moved to somwhere like spurs or chelski (who could afford him!)

I just prey that if we do end up selling him we have the common sense not to sell to someone in the premiership.
 
It's true, Mancini is poor with man management and a poor manager.
His failure at maintaining these premium dummy spitters, has prevented us from winning the FA Cup, qualifying for Champions League and being at the top of the premier League...

Oh hang on!......LOL!

The fact that just about every other manager and sport pundit has backed his firm stance with Tevez must mean nothing to this guy.
 
Talk about selective amnesia. Twitcher left Modric out of the scum game because " his head wasn't right and he didn't want to play " What a hypocritical wanker you are Mr Kidd.
 
grasybaby said:
Talk about selective amnesia. Twitcher left Modric out of the scum game because " his head wasn't right and he didn't want to play " What a hypocritical wanker you are Mr Kidd.
Click to expand...
Let's imagine for a second that you're wrong and he did play as he was told, as Mr Kidd suggests.

How is making an unhappy Modric play us, and therefore bringing about a 1-5 home defeat a better approach than Mancini telling Tevez to do one and therefore bringing about a 4-0 away win?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.