Spurs (H) | PL | Post Match Thread

[bluemonkey71]

Well that was frustrating. Their midfield had way more energy than us. Probably the best team we have played for a while. Defence was all over place. The ref was an absolute twat at the end for blowing

 

[cucumberman]

Like City a few years ago before prime Gundogan, prime Stones and always on de Bruyne.

It’s a double whammy. No Gundogan and de Bruyne for creativity, and Gvardiol and Kovecic to build a sparta team of defensive gladiators but no precision deft ninjas.

Alvarez is now the next Gabriel Jesus.

I’ve said it in October then and I say it now. Either Haaland or Alvarez but not both. Two up front means one less in the middle.

 

[uwerosler28]

Yeah after Ake's crap defending for the equaliser I'm not sure.

That was an exception That doesn't prove the rule

 

[lazerblue]

seen on sky, blatant cheating!

 

[Iassel]

Yeah right… I meant playing advantage and then when he saw we’d got an advantage pulling the play back.

Which would’ve been irrelevant if City hadn’t given away 3 painfully weak goals.

 

[homerdog]

Sky glossing over the bent bald bastard incident by saying "everyone makes mistakes!"

 

[cupsforcockups]

New players nowhere near the quality we have lost and let’s face it gundo got us out of quite a few messes that cannot be left to anyone else now

 

[Immel & Dibble]

Simon Hooper is what I imagine aids to look like under a microscope

 

[B\connellblue]

How can we not sign a proper left back season after season. Dereliction of duty at this stage.

 

[Tolmie scores]

I agree. Im not slagging haaland obviously but he misses chances too often.

Everyone had a pop at me last season when Haaland was hammering the numbers and i still kept banging on about Kabe lol. I still like Haaland's attitude. I bet he improves BUT we would have been a better team with Kane and he'd score as well. Haaland will be off probably in 2 years ..Kane would have retired with us..cost us more BUT .. well worth the outlay.