Blue tinted glasses firmly in place, i am happy to accept, that given the way things panned out, we were well beaten, by the better side (on the day), and ultimately got what we deserved.
BUT...................things could and SHOULD have been different. am i alone in thinking the following ? or is it the glasses?
1) Silva should have scored very early on, from close in
2) Wanyama came straight through the back of Fernandinho, in the build up to their first goal, i thought it was a
clear and obvious foul, although commentators descibed it as a good challenge, and "surprisingly" didn't show it
again, certainly no analysis.
3) Less said about Kolarov's excellent finish , the better
4) Thought there was a clear penalty, for foul on Sergio when score was 1 - 0, again commentators said "Sergio got there first, and nicked the ball away, ...but not enough in it," hmmm!
5) Rose having already been booked, shortly afterwards pulls Sterling back, when he was about to cut into the box
typically cynical challenge, that to me was a definite second yellow.....
6) Wanyama, again, having already been booked could / should have had a second yellow
7) Sergio hit the post, had a free kick well saved by Lloris (who also made a couple of excellent saves), and had 2 or 3 poor shots, and on another day could quite possibly have had a hat trick.
OK, a slighty biased view, but if none of the critically important key, goal changing decisions / moments, go your way, then neither will the result!
interesting point of view of the match and pretty much correct, although thought the penalty incident was iffy and the ref made the right decision
but you can't deny spurs were better on the day, more aggressive in the second ball situations and wasn't until fernando went off that we started exerting pressure
the stats say it was close game(dont think it was) more possession, similar shots on and off target
it was a bad day at the office