Squirming bankers

Sir James Crosby, dept head of FSA has just resigned... He used to be head of HBoS

good riddance!
 
Yes mate, he's dodgy as hell. He 'choose' to ignore Peter Moore, head of HBoS Risk when he advised the bank was going too fast and when PM complained he replaced him with a women with no Risk background at all. The women then actually asked PM what her role was as she was never given outline to the job!!

PM then complained to the FSA that this women wasn't suitabley qualified to do her role but was vitoed as Crosby was then dept head of FSA!!

I could go on...
 
Woahwoahwoah. Hold the fcuking phone here.

I was referring to rather bullying and controversial government plans to make sick people 'satisfactorily' prove they are sick and get everyone 'earning' their benefits by doing demeaning jobs that nobody else wants to do. Likewise anyone who for whatever reason has been out of work for a period of time. These are victimising ideas I do not support as they essentially amount to community service sentences for legitimate law abiding people who are unable to find work. A section of the community set only to increase massively thanks to the wholesale fuck ups of avaricious criminal bastards such as those sat squirming in front of the government panel yesterday. It is these people I believe should be punished for their crimes.

I do not expect people with cancer to pick up dog shit in the park.

You might remember Stu that I have followed your struggle with a terrible illness and have always wished you the best.

Whoooooosh.
 
quiet_riot said:
Made me laugh though how good old Prescott called their bonuses 'unethical and immoral'


Never had a bonus for doing fuck all then, John?

Spot on! What a hypocrite, one of the biggest freeloaders going is 'Mr Bulimia'
 
johnny , how the hell can someone get the gist of what your post was meant to say , without actually saying so ? ( re-read what you wrote mate ) my telepathy isn't what it use to be . and i wasn't the only one to 'get the wrong end of the stick ' .
no worries .

whoosh , my arse .

i do fully agree with the point you (finally) are making concerning the 'controversial' proposed government plans , and i wouldn't expect anyone who doesn't live in the real world to think otherwise . you'll find common sense isn't a pre-requisite for a large majority of politicians .

regards
stuart .
 
johnny on the spot said:
Woahwoahwoah. Hold the fcuking phone here.

I was referring to rather bullying and controversial government plans to make sick people 'satisfactorily' prove they are sick and get everyone 'earning' their benefits by doing demeaning jobs that nobody else wants to do. Likewise anyone who for whatever reason has been out of work for a period of time. These are victimising ideas I do not support as they essentially amount to community service sentences for legitimate law abiding people who are unable to find work. A section of the community set only to increase massively thanks to the wholesale fuck ups of avaricious criminal bastards such as those sat squirming in front of the government panel yesterday. It is these people I believe should be punished for their crimes.

I do not expect people with cancer to pick up dog shit in the park.

You might remember Stu that I have followed your struggle with a terrible illness and have always wished you the best.

Whoooooosh.

after reading your original post more carefully it makes sense now.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.