A
A
Anonymous
Guest
I'm desperate for some 'expert' to come out & tell the truth...
1. He was a very good player, but he was never a great player
2. He is well passed his best
3. He hasn't been of any importance to England for several years
4. His absence at the World Cup could be a good thing for England
5. Not all football fans in the country are gutted by the news of his injury
6. Celeb obsessed, shallow, Kyle watchers are the ones who are gutted by the news
7. He's still a rag cnut who hates City so fuck him.
1. He was a very good player, but he was never a great player
2. He is well passed his best
3. He hasn't been of any importance to England for several years
4. His absence at the World Cup could be a good thing for England
5. Not all football fans in the country are gutted by the news of his injury
6. Celeb obsessed, shallow, Kyle watchers are the ones who are gutted by the news
7. He's still a rag cnut who hates City so fuck him.