Matt the Giant said:Xyplode said:----------------------Hart-------------------
-Richards----Kompany-----Lescott-----Clichy-
---------------Yaya--------De Jong----------
------Balotelli--------Nasri----------Silva-----
--------------------Aguero------------------
Veeery nice!!
Or how about:
----------------------Hart------------------------
-Richards----Kompany-----Lescott-----Clichy-
---------------Yaya--------De Jong-------------
------Aguero--------Mata----------Silva--------
--------------------Balotelli----------------------
Pardon me for saying so - but aren't; Silva,Aguero AND Mata ALL left footers?<br /><br />-- Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:31 pm --<br /><br />
Chick Counterfly said:Mata is just a superior footballer to Nasri.
I don't really see it. Mata is smaller and faster, a better team player, but there's no doubt in my mind that Nasri has more outright ability to pass and finish accurately, strongly. He might even be a more effective dribbler despite the speed disadvantage.
If pushed I'd accept that Mata might have more potential but he's still playing in u21 tournaments. Nasri has been doing it for a while against the Utds, Chelsea, and of course in the CL.
Mata is just like Silva. A team player and facilitator. We could have 4 of these guys, pass the ball beautifully and never score the goals. He's inferior to Silva, so what's the point?
Nasri is the guy who might go missing, but frequently makes the breakthrough on his own. He's superior to AJ and would complement Silva and Yaya. That's why we're in for him.
Oddly, after this I'm more convinced Mata is the right man - which is the opposite to the effect you probably envisaged?