Stop loaning players we dont want

Lucky13 said:
prairiemoon said:
loaning out Bridge is a weak bit of business

No one will buy him , what else can we do?

why not keep him around with the youngsters? Ive aways thought it was good to have a few seasoned pros around the reserves/academy.
 
prairiemoon said:
Lucky13 said:
prairiemoon said:
loaning out Bridge is a weak bit of business

No one will buy him , what else can we do?

why not keep him around with the youngsters? Ive aways thought it was good to have a few seasoned pros around the reserves/academy.




Agree


i would of let him walk for nothing to save the wage or say play with the kids for a year
 
sergiokun said:
prairiemoon said:
Lucky13 said:
No one will buy him , what else can we do?

why not keep him around with the youngsters? Ive aways thought it was good to have a few seasoned pros around the reserves/academy.




Agree


i would of let him walk for nothing to save the wage or say play with the kids for a year

and have him tell them how great it is to be at city and poisen the atmosphere around the youngsters, I would rather him fuck off to Brighton and we pay him ten grand a week less. I get the point that it will send a message to anybody who refuses to move on but Bridge decided a long time ago that if it was between cash and playing time, cash wins everytime, in short it would be pointless, so we might as well save as much cash as we can.
 
let's put this in perspective, what would you do if you were in his shoes

exactly the same, and personally, even less

sorry i don't live in an ivory tower like the rest of you
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.