Stupid City fans

[Sky Blue]

I still think that a more attacking minded coach will help City so much.

I have nothing against Mancini. He's a good guy but I think with a some more attacking style we would win games far more easily

Most games we play see us camped in our opponents half....Who would you like, Ossie Ardiles and a 2-2-6 formation?

 

[Rammy Blue]

I'm at a loss at the amount of crap there is on this forum. There are posts slagging Hart, Silva, Yaya, Nasri, Mancini and more currently running and frankly they are bullshit.

I don't believe that our players are beyond being criticised but some of the posts are beyond belief. Yes Hart was at fault at Sunderland. Yes Silva was poor as well. Yes Nasri should have stayed cool but the way OUR team is being slaughtered is a joke. Ask yourselves this. Who is better than Hart? Than Silva? Than Yaya? I expect it from knobhead rags but not Blues.

As a season ticket holder for 38 years this is the best I've seen by a distance. Either be constructive or piss off!

You identified the problem and they post on here impersonating blues. They've been doing it for 20 years in different media starting with radio. They have psychological problems

I thought they were blues who had different views from the majority.....

I agree with this poster.

 

[adrianr]

I'm at a loss at the amount of crap there is on this forum. There are posts slagging Hart, Silva, Yaya, Nasri, Mancini and more currently running and frankly they are bullshit.

I don't believe that our players are beyond being criticised but some of the posts are beyond belief. Yes Hart was at fault at Sunderland. Yes Silva was poor as well. Yes Nasri should have stayed cool but the way OUR team is being slaughtered is a joke. Ask yourselves this. Who is better than Hart? Than Silva? Than Yaya? I expect it from knobhead rags but not Blues.

As a season ticket holder for 38 years this is the best I've seen by a distance. Either be constructive or piss off!

Problem is some people on here wouldn't recognise constructive criticism (which is a bit of a misnomer given nothing we say on here will change anything anyway) if it hit them in the face. As soon as you even hint at the possibility someone like Yaya or Silva is under performing or they could do with sitting out a game you're drowned under "Rag rag rag I've been watching City for 400 years and never seen a team as good as this rag rag rag".

It's far too often black and bloody white with this place. World Class or shite needs to be sold. Unswerving uncriticizing support or Raggy Rag Rag. Always without realising that posters of the former nature are just as bad for the place as the latter. A forum that tries to suppress criticism, through moderation or social pressures, is basically RAWK. Ok for the scouse, not so much for us.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I'm at a loss at the amount of crap there is on this forum. There are posts slagging Hart, Silva, Yaya, Nasri, Mancini and more currently running and frankly they are bullshit.

I don't believe that our players are beyond being criticised but some of the posts are beyond belief. Yes Hart was at fault at Sunderland. Yes Silva was poor as well. Yes Nasri should have stayed cool but the way OUR team is being slaughtered is a joke. Ask yourselves this. Who is better than Hart? Than Silva? Than Yaya? I expect it from knobhead rags but not Blues.

As a season ticket holder for 38 years this is the best I've seen by a distance. Either be constructive or piss off!

Problem is some people on here wouldn't recognise constructive criticism (which is a bit of a misnomer given nothing we say on here will change anything anyway) if it hit them in the face. As soon as you even hint at the possibility someone like Yaya or Silva is under performing or they could do with sitting out a game you're drowned under "Rag rag rag I've been watching City for 400 years and never seen a team as good as this rag rag rag".

It's far too often black and bloody white with this place. World Class or shite needs to be sold. Unswerving uncriticizing support or Raggy Rag Rag. Always without realising that posters of the former nature are just as bad for the place as the latter. A forum that tries to suppress criticism, through moderation or social pressures, is basically RAWK. Ok for the scouse, not so much for us.

I have been following City for a little under 400 years, but I'm more than capable of distinguishing between the hoards of negative blues who proliferate our support and united fans masquerading as City fans on here.

The question you have to ask yourself when determining which camp people fall into is this: Would a City fan say such a thing?

In my experience many City fans are critical of their own. It seems to be in their DNA, but there's a world of difference from that and those that seek to undermine the club with sly digs that no blue could ever contemplate.

I love the fact that this forum allows all sorts of opinions, especially from fans of other clubs, many of whom will vouch for my support of their right to post on here, but with any such system there will be people who abuse it and try and spoil it for the rest. Maybe that doesn't bother you too much, but ignoring it won't make it go away.

 

[Anonymous]

A forum that tries to suppress criticism, through moderation or social pressures, is basically RAWK. Ok for the scouse, not so much for us.

Nail on head. You deserve a medal for calling it as it is. We laugh at RAWK yet i find it hard to tell the difference between the two forums if you check out the victim mentality and general paranoia which inhabits them both.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

A forum that tries to suppress criticism, through moderation or social pressures, is basically RAWK. Ok for the scouse, not so much for us.

Nail on head. You deserve a medal for calling it as it is. We laugh at RAWK yet i find it hard to tell the difference between the two forums if you check out the victim mentality and general paranoia which inhabits them both.

You need to lie down, mate.

Light a candle or something ;)

 

[Anonymous]

You need to lie down, mate.

Light a candle or something ;)

Spent too much of the last 10 days lying down ... ;)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

A forum that tries to suppress criticism, through moderation or social pressures, is basically RAWK. Ok for the scouse, not so much for us.

Nail on head. You deserve a medal for calling it as it is. We laugh at RAWK yet i find it hard to tell the difference between the two forums if you check out the victim mentality and general paranoia which inhabits them both.

Hmmm seems a bit raggy to me.

*strokes chin knowingly*

 

[Anonymous]

A forum that tries to suppress criticism, through moderation or social pressures, is basically RAWK. Ok for the scouse, not so much for us.

Nail on head. You deserve a medal for calling it as it is. We laugh at RAWK yet i find it hard to tell the difference between the two forums if you check out the victim mentality and general paranoia which inhabits them both.

Hmmm seems a bit raggy to me.

*strokes himself proudly*

Fixed it for you ... :)

 

[Danamy]

You need to lie down, mate.

Light a candle or something ;)

Spent too much of the last 10 days lying down ... ;)

You whore!!