yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
Hahahahaha Hahahahaha Hahahahaha Hahahahaha ha h............. bored now laughing at the dippers ,well its been nye on 8 months..de niro said:
but I shall resume come what may...later.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Suarez - banned for 4 months (page 74)
- Thread starter Malty
- Start date
but I shall resume come what may...later.
r.soleofsalford said:No sympathy for Liverpool or the arsehole`s who booed our team from start to finish at Anfield for no apparent reason.
Now this is Karma you sad set of cunts
Am I the only one who isn't arsed about the booing ? It just added to the atmosphere. Cheering when Yaya was injured and bricking the coaches are the things that pissed me off.
D
D
Deleted member 58619
Guest
YungJoshiiMcFc said:I don't get this at all. He's banned for four months from today onwards. He'll be doing fuck all until mid August anyways?!
Immediate ban from the WC, a years ban in domestic and European football, and a major slash in his wages would have been sufficient...
And then public execution.
I vote yes
Plaything of the gods
Well-Known Member
Surprised it wasn't longer, but should suit City, unless we play in CL against him, so I'm happy with it. If he stays at Livenpoo he'll be back for Chelsea, United and Arsenal. Unless he picks up another ban.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Me too mate. People getting precious about some booing is fucking comical imo.stony said:r.soleofsalford said:No sympathy for Liverpool or the arsehole`s who booed our team from start to finish at Anfield for no apparent reason.
Now this is Karma you sad set of cunts
Am I the only one who isn't arsed about the booing ? It just added to the atmosphere. Cheering when Yaya was injured and bricking the coaches are the things that pissed me off.
Too many la-de-da wankers following football these days.
D
D
Deleted member 58678
Guest
I can't believe this, I really can't!
A paltry four fucking months? I'm disgusted!
In my opinion this should have been a custodial sentence with a ban from football for six months after release. Four months, nine fucking Prem games, fuck right off!
He's one lucky bastard. He's got off so lightly with this. Four fucking months, unbelievable. And a tiny fine too!
A paltry four fucking months? I'm disgusted!
In my opinion this should have been a custodial sentence with a ban from football for six months after release. Four months, nine fucking Prem games, fuck right off!
He's one lucky bastard. He's got off so lightly with this. Four fucking months, unbelievable. And a tiny fine too!
D
D
Deleted member 58678
Guest
I find it incredibly mard that people are bothered about another set of fans booing our team. I don't even care if they cheer a minor injury. I'm certain we'd be the same with four or five other teams' key players.stony said:r.soleofsalford said:No sympathy for Liverpool or the arsehole`s who booed our team from start to finish at Anfield for no apparent reason.
Now this is Karma you sad set of cunts
Am I the only one who isn't arsed about the booing ? It just added to the atmosphere. Cheering when Yaya was injured and bricking the coaches are the things that pissed me off.
WithingtonWonderer
Member
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 10
Can the PFA Player of the Year award be revoked?
Anything to pile on the ignominy.
Anything to pile on the ignominy.
And if I read another post saying, "My red mates were right all along, they're the real scum. Miles worse than United."
We I'm gonna throw myself off the Liver building and only be saved by the copious amounts of puke that will have accumulated at the bottom as I imagine having United fans as mates.
We I'm gonna throw myself off the Liver building and only be saved by the copious amounts of puke that will have accumulated at the bottom as I imagine having United fans as mates.
When Liverpool signed Suarez they knew following the biting incident in Holland he was damaged goods, Ajax contacted numerous clubs trying to sell him and midway through his suspension Liverpool signed him.
Next follows the Evra incident again there is no doubt that Liverpool have a player that will cause problems, is damaged goods. But what do Liverpool do? Do they think we have a problem? No they quite simply cant recognise where the problem lies.
Lets not forget the handball at the last WC or the handball goals and the dives.
So on to the biting of Ivanovic. Surely the alarm bells were ringing. Oh no they yet again support the player.
On then to the Italy game and what do they say about not being able to teach a old dog new tricks?
From day one Liverpool knew the man was trouble they had every chance to get rid last year but decided not to.
When I hear people say its unfair on Liverpool I cant help but smile. They knew what they were getting into they took the decision to carry on employing him and now will not be able to pick him instead they will have to play someone in his place. Hardly the end of the world and yes I get it he is a top player but there lack of decisive action, similar to how Ajax reacted, has come home to roost. So yes they do have to share some of the responsibility for their employees actions.
I read elsewhere someone making the point about duty of care and in view of his past actions and the likelihood that this will happen again that Liverpool , should he stay, could well be exposed in terms of a claim of veracious liability .
Next follows the Evra incident again there is no doubt that Liverpool have a player that will cause problems, is damaged goods. But what do Liverpool do? Do they think we have a problem? No they quite simply cant recognise where the problem lies.
Lets not forget the handball at the last WC or the handball goals and the dives.
So on to the biting of Ivanovic. Surely the alarm bells were ringing. Oh no they yet again support the player.
On then to the Italy game and what do they say about not being able to teach a old dog new tricks?
From day one Liverpool knew the man was trouble they had every chance to get rid last year but decided not to.
When I hear people say its unfair on Liverpool I cant help but smile. They knew what they were getting into they took the decision to carry on employing him and now will not be able to pick him instead they will have to play someone in his place. Hardly the end of the world and yes I get it he is a top player but there lack of decisive action, similar to how Ajax reacted, has come home to roost. So yes they do have to share some of the responsibility for their employees actions.
I read elsewhere someone making the point about duty of care and in view of his past actions and the likelihood that this will happen again that Liverpool , should he stay, could well be exposed in terms of a claim of veracious liability .