sunday suplement (Merged)

[SWP's back]

Re: sunday suplement

About the goalkeeper thing, has anybody asked the question how we got in this fix in the first place?

Allowing your second keeper out on season long loan, only leaving an understudy they clearly do not trust (or he would have played yesterday!) does not look like good management.

Its seems reasonable to ask the question.

You forget Taylor - who is injured you know nothing fool.<br /><br />-- Sun May 02, 2010 10:59 am --<br /><br />

To be fair, i can't be the only one that can see how it looks a little out of order that we brought someone in as emergency loan and then played him over a current City player in Nielsen .
We haven't broken any rules and it's only my opinion but we should have played Nielsen yesterday and used the loan player on the bench.
In effect we've brought in an emergency player NOT because we's use him as cover from the bench but because our management don't rate Mr Nielsen.

Mancini is allowed to field the strobgest team within his squad. If he thought Fullop was better than Gunner in training then what is wrong with playing him?

Oh and Alan the **** Green agrees with you so you are keeping great company on this.

 

[mancunial]

Re: sunday suplement

why can,t they just be honest and say we don,t want city to get into the chumps league because we don,t like them, it,s easy?

 

[dandeman2008]

Re: sunday suplement

About the goalkeeper thing, has anybody asked the question how we got in this fix in the first place?

Allowing your second keeper out on season long loan, only leaving an understudy they clearly do not trust (or he would have played yesterday!) does not look like good management.

Its seems reasonable to ask the question.

You forget Taylor - who is injured you know nothing fool.

-- Sun May 02, 2010 10:59 am --

To be fair, i can't be the only one that can see how it looks a little out of order that we brought someone in as emergency loan and then played him over a current City player in Nielsen .
We haven't broken any rules and it's only my opinion but we should have played Nielsen yesterday and used the loan player on the bench.
In effect we've brought in an emergency player NOT because we's use him as cover from the bench but because our management don't rate Mr Nielsen.

Mancini is allowed to field the strobgest team within his squad. If he thought Fullop was better than Gunner in training then what is wrong with playing him?

Oh and Alan the **** Green agrees with you so you are keeping great company on this.

And you forget Gonzalez, who would be above Nielson as he has far more experience.

Given
Hart
Taylor
Gonzalez

Are all unavailable, meaning theoretically our 5th choice keeper Nielson would be called upon to play in net in the Premiership, hence the emergency loan situation.

 

[bizzbo]

Re: sunday suplement

oliver kay makes me laff

 

[bluemoon32]

Re: sunday suplement

About the goalkeeper thing, has anybody asked the question how we got in this fix in the first place?

Allowing your second keeper out on season long loan, only leaving an understudy they clearly do not trust (or he would have played yesterday!) does not look like good management.

Its seems reasonable to ask the question.

You forget Taylor - who is injured you know nothing fool.

-- Sun May 02, 2010 10:59 am --

To be fair, i can't be the only one that can see how it looks a little out of order that we brought someone in as emergency loan and then played him over a current City player in Nielsen .
We haven't broken any rules and it's only my opinion but we should have played Nielsen yesterday and used the loan player on the bench.
In effect we've brought in an emergency player NOT because we's use him as cover from the bench but because our management don't rate Mr Nielsen.

Mancini is allowed to field the strobgest team within his squad. If he thought Fullop was better than Gunner in training then what is wrong with playing him?

Oh and Alan the **** Green agrees with you so you are keeping great company on this.

No problem, like i said , it's only an opinion.
Something tells me that if Spurs or Villa had done the same this week then more than a few posters on this site would have gone nuts about it.
I said we didn't break any rules though and we didn't.

 

[Damocles]

Sunday Supplement

Just finished watching it on record (as there was no way I was getting up early after last night!).

What a horrific bunch of no nothing idiots. Not one of them seems to have a clue about Premier League regulations, about history, about the state of City or the owners. Apparently the owners were 'ruthless' to get rid of Hughes after giving him 'less than a year'. Oh, and it was a 'joke' that we brought in Fulop when we had Academy players and was only because 'City are rich and threw their toys out of the pram'. Villa have never done this seemingly.

All of them said that Spurs were favourites for the top four spot, and City would lose Tevez and Bellamy in the summer (because Tevez didn't come out the other day saying he loves City, and Bellamy didn't high five Mancini yesterday).

I'm not a 'the press all hate us' type of person, but that today was shocking in it's bile.

 

[Bluemoon115]

Re: Sunday Supplement

Just laugh.

I do.

It's funny.

They're squirming.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Re: Sunday Supplement

I suspect the London-based of any shade would much prefer to have the free ticket to WHLane, out of the office, on the tube, into hospitality, than trail upto Manchester.

If ignorant talking from fans and media ever got yer points Tottenham would have won the league by Christmas.

 

[kippaxwarrior]

Re: Sunday Supplement

Just finished watching it on record (as there was no way I was getting up early after last night!).

What a horrific bunch of no nothing idiots. Not one of them seems to have a clue about Premier League regulations, about history, about the state of City or the owners. Apparently the owners were 'ruthless' to get rid of Hughes after giving him 'less than a year'. Oh, and it was a 'joke' that we brought in Fulop when we had Academy players and was only because 'City are rich and threw their toys out of the pram'. Villa have never done this seemingly.

All of them said that Spurs were favourites for the top four spot, and City would lose Tevez and Bellamy in the summer (because Tevez didn't come out the other day saying he loves City, and Bellamy didn't high five Mancini yesterday).

I'm not a 'the press all hate us' type of person, but that today was shocking in it's bile.

I agree, however there is already a 4 page thread on this ;-)

<a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=173950" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=1&t=173950</a>

 

[johnny crossan]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FvrnzBJ__k[/youtube]

here's Part 2 if you missed it