mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Have to say I'm surprised if that is the case.Indications are that they will rule that Johnson acted unlawfully. They talked in detail about remedy and commentators have taken that as an important indicator of outcome.
Remedy? You really need a written constitution for a start.
Then changes to it can go to referendum, where precise wording and meaning would be put to you before voting.
What that would do to your notion of a parliamentary democracy, I don't know, but the state of your parliamentary democracy right now is the reason you are in the supreme court at the moment.