So you expect him to say he saw the ball?
No, I was told however he explicitly stated he did see it when every soundbite I saw or heard stated the opposite. And that point was relevant in the original conversation.
So you expect him to say he saw the ball?
“I have to say that there were players in front of the ball, so I didn’t even see the shot,” Cech told Sky Sports. “To be honest, there were people running across and I don’t know if one of them was David Silva or not, but I didn’t see the ball because it was behind the players.”
Not that I'm carrying on arguing the case of whether I think we may have benefitted as it could have been called offside, especially given refereeing standards in our matches, but to be called out numerous times when it's there on his sky sports interview transcript. Make of it what you will.
I guess they won't next time....cir
city fight to the end.
shame the fans don't.
I agree. The first sub was absolutely right as KDB was having no impact & Dinho was struggling playing in that role. But he should have done it around 65 minutes or even sooner.
The second sub was 5-10 minutes too late and the last one was, in my view, grossly irresponsible and unnecessary. There were seconds to go in a game we'd rescued but it allowed Dean to add more time on.
J remember Moyes doing that when Everton were 1-0 up and Micah scored in the added on time. Utterly stupid.
Didn't see any of the post match stuff earlier today, so apologies for the tardiness of this post and also the posibility (probability?) that it's already been mentionedJust saw Clement whining about our winning goal, claiming that
A. Kolarov wasn't fouled at the start of the move that led to the goal. Arguable.
B. The free kick wasn't taken from the actual spot where the foul took place. Which is correct.
C. The free kick was taken with a rolling ball. Again, correct.
Strangely enough though, he didn't offer an opinion on Swansea's goal having more than a hint of offside about it.