Syria (merged)

Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Markt85 said:
stonerblue said:
Simple question;

If the US arms the people fighting the government why are they not terrorists?

Because some governments are the terrorists and this is a cheap backhanded wrong way to get rid of it.

Then US are a ruthless force and have made some situations a lot worse with the way they handle there foreign policy, but they do stand for freedom and justice - they are not Evil like some beleive
I don't buy this idea of a clumsy foreign policy whereby they get involved without having a plan. The plan is to cause all the shit and turn the country into another Iraq/Afghanistan. Lots of money to be made for weapons firms, building contractors and security in the aftermath.

So yes, I believe they are evil in the way they go about things.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

This might be simplistic but sometimes whatever you do will have terrible consequences, there isn't a right answer to this from what i can see

we get grief for meddling
we get grief for not getting involved
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Just goes to show that once they get in power every politician the world over just does as theory are told. Obama eh? Just the same as fucking Bush.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

dronefromsector7g said:
Markt85 said:
stonerblue said:
Simple question;

If the US arms the people fighting the government why are they not terrorists?

Because some governments are the terrorists and this is a cheap backhanded wrong way to get rid of it.

Then US are a ruthless force and have made some situations a lot worse with the way they handle there foreign policy, but they do stand for freedom and justice - they are not Evil like some beleive
I don't buy this idea of a clumsy foreign policy whereby they get involved without having a plan. The plan is to cause all the shit and turn the country into another Iraq/Afghanistan. Lots of money to be made for weapons firms, building contractors and security in the aftermath.

So yes, I believe they are evil in the way they go about things.
They're for freedom and justice only when it suits them.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

dronefromsector7g said:
Markt85 said:
stonerblue said:
Simple question;

If the US arms the people fighting the government why are they not terrorists?

Because some governments are the terrorists and this is a cheap backhanded wrong way to get rid of it.

Then US are a ruthless force and have made some situations a lot worse with the way they handle there foreign policy, but they do stand for freedom and justice - they are not Evil like some beleive
I don't buy this idea of a clumsy foreign policy whereby they get involved without having a plan. The plan is to cause all the shit and turn the country into another Iraq/Afghanistan. Lots of money to be made for weapons firms, building contractors and security in the aftermath.


So yes, I believe they are evil in the way they go about things.

Otherwise known as 'The Shock Doctrine'
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

dronefromsector7g said:
Markt85 said:
stonerblue said:
Simple question;

If the US arms the people fighting the government why are they not terrorists?

Because some governments are the terrorists and this is a cheap backhanded wrong way to get rid of it.

Then US are a ruthless force and have made some situations a lot worse with the way they handle there foreign policy, but they do stand for freedom and justice - they are not Evil like some beleive
I don't buy this idea of a clumsy foreign policy whereby they get involved without having a plan. The plan is to cause all the shit and turn the country into another Iraq/Afghanistan. Lots of money to be made for weapons firms, building contractors and security in the aftermath.

So yes, I believe they are evil in the way they go about things.
They also get to choose the leaders based on solely how cooperative there are, so much for democracy.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

who gives a shit

leave them to it
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Never Mind The Pollocks said:
moonshiner said:
metalblue said:
US confirms chemical weapons have been used, the red line has been crossed



I'm glad you think it's funny Mr.Bush.
You can do soft humour at a push
You still can't find those WMD's ,oohh shoot
Looks like you fought that war for nothing
Ain't that a hoot

So go ahead with your buddies cracking gags
While down at the Airbase they unload the BODYBAGS
It's good to know how much those young lives meant
Even if you think it's funny,
Mr.President


I'm glad you find it funny Mr.B
You've sorted out your Daddy's legacy
Saddam is in the graveyard
You are walking tall
It wasn't your collateral that got damaged after all



Although the future may be brighter,non the less
In the here and now,you've made
A bloody awful mess.
Until you clean it up
I think it's best to "sush"
Even if you think it's funny



No else is laughing.
Mr.Bush.








If the U.S confirms it,it MUST be true!



I prefer Jeremys poem from Peep Show


'Fuck you, Bush!
It's time to get out off Iraq, Bush.
What were you even doing there in the first place, Bush?
You didn't even get properly elected, Bush.
Are you happy now, Bush?
Fuck you, Bush!'



U.S Hole.(Another poem about Bush)


We will Bombify you
Into oblivilisation
If you disagreearise
With our world abdomination
So stop ejecularising
Your rediculary accusations
They have no intelleriffic
Meanful reasons.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Markt85 said:
Going down a different path but when you mentioned morality , as an Athiest proves moral objectivity by insisting something is right when there worldview is that the world is nothing more than naturalistic therefore right or wrong is relative ? So in your worldview America can do what the hell they like there is no right or wrong ?
What an utter buffoon you are when you believe religion is the only way of forming a theory of morality. How arrogant are you? What makes it an even bigger nonsense is that the Bible is a text put together by committee in Nicaea, by men, not God. So you believe in morality put together by a few dozen men 1700 years ago... But wait, it gets better, half the shit you believe in is self-contradictory anyway. You've got your Old Testament, which your Nicaea men never seemed to think they should throw away, but a lot of it is contradicted by what Jesus is alleged to have said (a lot of which I believe are excellent values rarely followed by the Church, especially the Catholic Church - a ruthless and shameful political organisation with much blood and the suffering of innocent boys on its hands, or as George Orwell labelled it "a racket, pure and simple").

Anyway, let's look at your so-called morality from Leviticus:

3. Eating fat (3:17)

4. Eating blood (3:17)

7. Touching an unclean animal (5:2)

8. Carelessly making an oath (5:4)

12. Letting your hair become unkempt (10:6)

13. Tearing your clothes (10:6)

14. Drinking alcohol in holy places (bit of a problem for Catholics, this ‘un) (10:9)

15. Eating an animal which doesn’t both chew cud and has a divided hoof (cf: camel, rabbit, pig) (11:4-7)

16. Touching the carcass of any of the above (problems here for rugby) (11:8)

17. Eating – or touching the carcass of – any seafood without fins or scales (11:10-12)

18. Eating – or touching the carcass of - eagle, the vulture, the black vulture, the red kite, any kind of black kite, any kind of raven, the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl, the white owl, the desert owl, the osprey, the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat. (11:13-19)

19. Eating – or touching the carcass of – flying insects with four legs, unless those legs are jointed (11:20-22)

20. Eating any animal which walks on all four and has paws (good news for cats) (11:27)

21. Eating – or touching the carcass of – the weasel, the rat, any kind of great lizard, the gecko, the monitor lizard, the wall lizard, the skink and the chameleon (11:29)

22. Eating – or touching the carcass of – any creature which crawls on many legs, or its belly (11:41-42)

23. Going to church within 33 days after giving birth to a boy (12:4)

24. Going to church within 66 days after giving birth to a girl (12:5)

39. Having sex with a man “as one does with a woman” (18:22)

41. Making idols or “metal gods” (19:4)

42. Reaping to the very edges of a field (19:9)

43. Picking up grapes that have fallen in your vineyard (19:10)

48. Holding back the wages of an employee overnight (not well observed these days) (19:13)

54. Mixing fabrics in clothing (19:19)

55. Cross-breeding animals (19:19)

56. Planting different seeds in the same field (19:19)

58. Eating fruit from a tree within four years of planting it (19:23)

60. Trimming your beard (19:27)

61. Cutting your hair at the sides (19:27)

62. Getting tattoos (19:28)

65. Not standing in the presence of the elderly (19:32)

71. Slaughtering a cow/sheep and its young on the same day (22:28)

72. Working on the Sabbath (23:3)

73. Blasphemy (punishable by stoning to death) (24:14)

75. Selling land permanently (25:23)

76. Selling an Israelite as a slave (foreigners are fine) (25:42)

Or how about this one from Deuteronomy:

18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:

19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

So Biblical morality makes punishable things probably 99.9% of us, including you, do. It commands you stone your disobedient children to death. It demands you punish blasphemers (even if they don't believe in your nonsense) with death. It demands homosexuals be put to death.

Oh yes, I feel quite comfortable comparing my morality to your Nicaea council-made 'holy' book. Very fucking comfortable. You see, I have formed by own path of morality. It is mostly based of John Stuart Mills theory, and the absolute fact, of individual autonomy. You see, we each have control over our own bodies and actions. We marry that fact to the idea that man should be free to express their autonomy as long as they don't harm the freedom of another individual to pursue their freedom of autonomy. So, from equality + individual autonomy = the harm principle. Which basically states, do whatever you want, as long as you do not harm others. So, my morality does not allow me to harm anyone. Indeed, I've never thrown a first punch at anyone in my life, and never will. I extend this further in that I never harm wasps, spiders etc. either. If I find them, I trap them and release them outside, or with spiders allow them to scuttle off and hide by tapping near them. Although I accept this cannot be law, but it's certainly part of my internal morality. My morality does not allow slavery of non-Israelites as yours does. However, my morality also allows homosexuals to go about their business without being stoned to death. It allows disobedient children to go without being stoned to death. It allows me to wear clothing made from two different fabrics. It allows me to trim my beard, cut my hair and get a tattoo. Your so-called morality, does not.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Skashion said:
Markt85 said:
Going down a different path but when you mentioned morality , as an Athiest proves moral objectivity by insisting something is right when there worldview is that the world is nothing more than naturalistic therefore right or wrong is relative ? So in your worldview America can do what the hell they like there is no right or wrong ?
What an utter buffoon you are when you believe religion is the only way of forming a theory of morality. How arrogant are you? What makes it an even bigger nonsense is that the Bible is a text put together by committee in Nicaea, by men, not God. So you believe in morality put together by a few dozen men 1700 years ago... But wait, it gets better, half the shit you believe in is self-contradictory anyway. You've got your Old Testament, which your Nicaea men never seemed to think they should throw away, but a lot of it is contradicted by what Jesus is alleged to have said (a lot of which I believe are excellent values rarely followed by the Church, especially the Catholic Church - a ruthless and shameful political organisation with much blood and the suffering of innocent boys on its hands, or as George Orwell labelled it "a racket, pure and simple").

Anyway, let's look at your so-called morality from Leviticus:

3. Eating fat (3:17)

4. Eating blood (3:17)

7. Touching an unclean animal (5:2)

8. Carelessly making an oath (5:4)

12. Letting your hair become unkempt (10:6)

13. Tearing your clothes (10:6)

14. Drinking alcohol in holy places (bit of a problem for Catholics, this ‘un) (10:9)

15. Eating an animal which doesn’t both chew cud and has a divided hoof (cf: camel, rabbit, pig) (11:4-7)

16. Touching the carcass of any of the above (problems here for rugby) (11:8)

17. Eating – or touching the carcass of – any seafood without fins or scales (11:10-12)

18. Eating – or touching the carcass of - eagle, the vulture, the black vulture, the red kite, any kind of black kite, any kind of raven, the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl, the white owl, the desert owl, the osprey, the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat. (11:13-19)

19. Eating – or touching the carcass of – flying insects with four legs, unless those legs are jointed (11:20-22)

20. Eating any animal which walks on all four and has paws (good news for cats) (11:27)

21. Eating – or touching the carcass of – the weasel, the rat, any kind of great lizard, the gecko, the monitor lizard, the wall lizard, the skink and the chameleon (11:29)

22. Eating – or touching the carcass of – any creature which crawls on many legs, or its belly (11:41-42)

23. Going to church within 33 days after giving birth to a boy (12:4)

24. Going to church within 66 days after giving birth to a girl (12:5)

39. Having sex with a man “as one does with a woman” (18:22)

41. Making idols or “metal gods” (19:4)

42. Reaping to the very edges of a field (19:9)

43. Picking up grapes that have fallen in your vineyard (19:10)

48. Holding back the wages of an employee overnight (not well observed these days) (19:13)

54. Mixing fabrics in clothing (19:19)

55. Cross-breeding animals (19:19)

56. Planting different seeds in the same field (19:19)

58. Eating fruit from a tree within four years of planting it (19:23)

60. Trimming your beard (19:27)

61. Cutting your hair at the sides (19:27)

62. Getting tattoos (19:28)

65. Not standing in the presence of the elderly (19:32)

71. Slaughtering a cow/sheep and its young on the same day (22:28)

72. Working on the Sabbath (23:3)

73. Blasphemy (punishable by stoning to death) (24:14)

75. Selling land permanently (25:23)

76. Selling an Israelite as a slave (foreigners are fine) (25:42)

Or how about this one from Deuteronomy:

18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:

19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

So Biblical morality makes punishable things probably 99.9% of us, including you, do. It commands you stone your disobedient children to death. It demands you punish blasphemers (even if they don't believe in your nonsense) with death. It demands homosexuals be put to death.

Oh yes, I feel quite comfortable comparing my morality to your Nicaea council-made 'holy' book. Very fucking comfortable. You see, I have formed by own path of morality. It is mostly based of John Stuart Mills theory, and the absolute fact, of individual autonomy. You see, we each have control over our own bodies and actions. We marry that fact to the idea that man should be free to express their autonomy as long as they don't harm the freedom of another individual to pursue their freedom of autonomy. So, from equality + individual autonomy = the harm principle. Which basically states, do whatever you want, as long as you do not harm others. So, my morality does not allow me to harm anyone. Indeed, I've never thrown a first punch at anyone in my life, and never will. I extend this further in that I never harm wasps, spiders etc. either. If I find them, I trap them and release them outside, or with spiders allow them to scuttle off and hide by tapping near them. Although I accept this cannot be law, but it's certainly part of my internal morality. My morality does not allow slavery of non-Israelites as yours does. However, my morality also allows homosexuals to go about their business without being stoned to death. It allows disobedient children to go without being stoned to death. It allows me to wear clothing made from two different fabrics. It allows me to trim my beard, cut my hair and get a tattoo. Your so-called morality, does not.

Jesus Christ changed all that.
That is the difference.
Has a Christian i'm bound by the teachings of Christ ie the new testament.
not the old laws.
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

BlueMo' said:
Jesus Christ changed all that.
That is the difference.
Has a Christian i'm bound by the teachings of Christ ie the new testament.
not the old laws.
I'm pretty sure the Ten Commandments are in the Old Testament, and pray tell, why does the Church still have an issue with gays if that's just Old Testament?
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Skashion said:
BlueMo' said:
Jesus Christ changed all that.
That is the difference.
Has a Christian i'm bound by the teachings of Christ ie the new testament.
not the old laws.
I'm pretty sure the Ten Commandments are in the Old Testament, and pray tell, why does the Church still have an issue with gays if that's just Old Testament?

I can't speak for the church which in my opinion is a million
miles away from Christs teachings.
They quote all that stuff when it suits.
Jesus taught tolerance,love and forgiveness.
"Let he amongst you who is without sin cast the first stone"
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

BlueMo' said:
I can't speak for the church which in my opinion is a million
miles away from Christs teachings.
They quote all that stuff when it suits.
Jesus taught tolerance,love and forgiveness.
"Let he amongst you who is without sin cast the first stone"
I have no problem with Jesus, as I made clear earlier. I embrace his values, without thinking he was the son of God.

Does that mean you don't place any credence in the Ten Commandments then as they are Old Testament?
 
Re: Syria: EU Lifts Embargo on Arms to Rebels

Skashion said:
BlueMo' said:
I can't speak for the church which in my opinion is a million
miles away from Christs teachings.
They quote all that stuff when it suits.
Jesus taught tolerance,love and forgiveness.
"Let he amongst you who is without sin cast the first stone"
I have no problem with Jesus, as I made clear earlier. I embrace his values, without thinking he was the son of God.

Does that mean you don't place any credence in the Ten Commandments then as they are Old Testament?

Having a belief in Christ tells me anyway that i should not kill, bear false witness, steal, commit adultery.that i should honour my Father and my Mother etc.
Of course i am only human.
To err is human,to forgive divine.
I never said Jesus was the son of God, i don't think he ever claimed that.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top