Talksport now (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fallingbostel Blue said:
Did Rogers not mentioned they blew a 3 goal lead when a Crystal Palace sub came on who was signed for a mere pittance. #thoughtnot
Yeah but you have to add up the £5.5m the Crystal Palace subs brought on cost to the £900,000m the City subs cost, which actually means Palace brought on £[Liverpool yearly Dole] worth of subs which isn't fair because CANDLE CANDLE CANDLE
 
They lose to Chelsea and his excuse is Manchester City have expensive players.

They drop points at palace and Manchester City have expensive players.

He forgot to buy milk this morning and Manchester City have expensive players.

Very, very bitter man that is so convinced in his own legacy that he is now spouting his excuses to every man and his dog in an attempt to to take attention away from the fact he had no plan B v Chelsea and should have seen the game out at 3-1 against Palace.
 
Don't Liverpool also have expensive players?
Suarez 25m
Johnson 18m
Henderson 20m
Sturridge 15m
Just off the top of my head sure there are others
 
DavidWhitesBoots said:
Don't Liverpool also have expensive players?
Suarez 25m
Johnson 18m
Henderson 20m
Sturridge 15m
Just off the top of my head sure there are others

No, the players paid their own transfer fees to play for Liverpool because of their history and future world dominance
 
Shirley said:
The cookie monster said:
He's at it again
City brought on £90 million worth of subs,I hate this ****.

He did say Liverpool want to be in a similar situation next season with being in the CL.
Well Brenda good luck with that. hope you don't break the FFP rules.


I read they have broken them already but as not been in Champions League it didn't matter
 
ob said:
Shirley said:
The cookie monster said:
He's at it again
City brought on £90 million worth of subs,I hate this ****.

He did say Liverpool want to be in a similar situation next season with being in the CL.
Well Brenda good luck with that. hope you don't break the FFP rules.


I read they have broken them already but as not been in Champions League it didn't matter


They would have failed FFP as their losses have been 90mill plus in last 2 years the fact they haven't been in CL deems that irrelevant, illustrates how bizarre the whole FFP thing is.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Say what you like about John Barnes, but his rapping on 'World In Motion' was one of the funniest things I have ever heard, and still cracks me up, as he couldn't rap a fucking Christmas present.
Chuck D he is not.
John Barnes is the only person I know who raps in his every day talking.i need to have him on slow motion.
 
west didsblue said:
Eds said:
Hate to be pedantic but if Brenda was talking about Negredo, Jovetic and Ferny I thought they cost a combined total circa £75 million. Never let the facts get in the way of a soundbite. And after Noel had talked about the class that both MP and Brenda had brought to the title race
Initial fees were 16.4M, 22.4M and 30M; a total of £68.8M. There were some add ons for Negredo (an extra £4M) but when talking about transfers its usually the initial fees that are referenced.

I did say circa £75m so that was my get out clause although if we use UEFAs calculating method those three players cost £415 million plus weekly wages of £250k each
 
Don't bother listening to John Barnes these days, well, since he came out in support of the racist any way, shows how little, deep down what 'zero tolerance to racism' meant to him, well and truly on the dipper gravy train and ready to 'toe the party line.

Ps Rogders is a c*nt.
 
blue underpants said:
This Bob Mills on now with Murray sounds pissed or very hungover


Him, Groves and Matterface did **** Brenda on some comment he made about Us.....didn't quite catch what it was.....not a peep from plazzy Murray though.
 
Sky Blue said:
blue underpants said:
This Bob Mills on now with Murray sounds pissed or very hungover


Him, Groves and Matterface did **** Brenda on some comment he made about Us.....didn't quite catch what it was.....not a peep from plazzy Murray though.
They said Pool fans were walking around in 'champions 14' T shirts, Murray denied it
 
blue underpants said:
Sky Blue said:
blue underpants said:
This Bob Mills on now with Murray sounds pissed or very hungover


Him, Groves and Matterface did **** Brenda on some comment he made about Us.....didn't quite catch what it was.....not a peep from plazzy Murray though.
They said Pool fans were walking around in 'champions 14' T shirts, Murray denied it

Heard that. He was in full on Dipper defence mode.
 
Sky Blue said:
blue underpants said:
Sky Blue said:
Him, Groves and Matterface did **** Brenda on some comment he made about Us.....didn't quite catch what it was.....not a peep from plazzy Murray though.
They said Pool fans were walking around in 'champions 14' T shirts, Murray denied it

Heard that. He was in full on Dipper defence mode.

Just tweeted him this

BnL8z0VIUAEEtkg.jpg
 
Sky Blue said:
blue underpants said:
This Bob Mills on now with Murray sounds pissed or very hungover


Him, Groves and Matterface did **** Brenda on some comment he made about Us.....didn't quite catch what it was.....not a peep from plazzy Murray though.

It was about Rodgers comment on coming 2nd to "the biggest paid ..............................." and Mills said it was a churlish quote from Rodgers. I,ve checked in my dictionary and it says bitter,cuntish and unsporting. Or summat like that.................
 
dcj said:
Sky Blue said:
blue underpants said:
This Bob Mills on now with Murray sounds pissed or very hungover


Him, Groves and Matterface did **** Brenda on some comment he made about Us.....didn't quite catch what it was.....not a peep from plazzy Murray though.

It was about Rodgers comment on coming 2nd to "the biggest paid ..............................." and Mills said it was a churlish quote from Rodgers. I,ve checked in my dictionary and it says bitter,cuntish and unsporting. Or summat like that.................

It is absolutely certain that no less than seventeen teams will finish below Liverpool. Probably it will be 18 and maybe even 19 (god forbid).

Ignoring us and chelsea, how many of the 17 teams that will definitely finish below Liverpool will have lower overall wage bills than them?

My guess would be, certainly 14, probably 15 and maybe 16. Only the scum will have significantly higher wages, but I'm not so sure about Spuds and Arse.

Puts Brenda's comments into a sort of context, really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top