Talksport

O'Hara openly just asked "What were Villa doing?"...even though he was Anfield yesterday. WANKER.

He also turned around and said... "Maybe Liverpool fans didn't run on the field as they're used to having success"
 
Last edited:
O'Hara openly just asked "What were Villa doing?"...even though he was Anfield yesterday. WANKER.

He also turned around and said... "Maybe Liverpool fans didn't run on the field as they're used to having success"
City 14 trophies in the last 12 seasons.

Liverpool 5 trophies in the last 12 seasons.
 
O'Hara openly just asked "What were Villa doing?"...even though he was Anfield yesterday. WANKER.

He also turned around and said... "Maybe Liverpool fans didn't run on the field as they're used to having success"
I've turned it on for the first time in ages. O'Hara is very bitter. But the whole tone is negativity towards City. They are making a lot about the "assault" on Olsen. Was it really that bad? I've not seen anything conclusive. Why was Olsen standing on the edge of his area instead of heading for the tunnel? Was he deliberately assaulted, or did someone run in to him almost accidentally?

McCoist is ok though.
 
O'Hara openly just asked "What were Villa doing?"...even though he was Anfield yesterday. WANKER.

He also turned around and said... "Maybe Liverpool fans didn't run on the field as they're used to having success"

Normally a prelude to a pitch invasion by City fans is a league title being won. Why would the scousers get on the pitch to celebrate finishing 2nd?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.