mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
It probably is an age thing.Maybe it’s an age thing. Maybe our generation, once you mention pop, thinks immediately about Sparks, Beatles, beach boys, kinks, T Rex, 10cc, Roxy, Bowie, and if we keep going a little longer, Deacon Blue, Prefab Sprout, Squeeze and others. All quite different but all bloody fine pop music.
then someone plays an album with three minute songs in it, calls it sophisticated pop and immediately we set it against our reference library. It’s tough to get excited when there is nothing unique or new in what you are listening to.
I tended to think of pop music as chart music. Bands that specifically wrote singles. I considered it purely commercial in it’s most obvious jangly way.
But maybe that’s the problem with that kind of thinking. We end up compartmenting bands into a preconceived niche or genre. We try to put names on the kind of music. But so many artists play across multiple genres, Bowie being the prime example of not letting himself become compartmentalised. ( I think I just made that word up) And his longevity is as a result of this in no small way.
All musicians draw on influences from previous generations as well as their contemporaries. I am even now listening to stuff I love like what I offered in here and finding a multitude of comparisons with stuff that sometimes has me scratching my head. I can sometimes hear Blur, World Party, The Foo Fighters, and others in the one album as well as the band just sounding like themselves and nobody else sounding like them. Hell sometimes I hear all that and throw in The Doors and The Who all in one song. That’s just my experience influencing me, I guess.
And still the music seems unique to me.
At the end of the day what is pop nowadays? What is wrong with an element of commerciality in a bands repertoire. God knows it’s hard enough for them to make a dollar these days.
Last edited: