The Album Review Club - Week #147 - (page 1942) - Blonde On Blonde - Bob Dylan

See I don’t care if he or anyone else wanted to be a rock star at eight (although I suspect he is far from being the only one). For the most part I stick music on and judge it on what I listen to. If I really like it I might trouble myself with the lyrics. In a small number of instances I will go deeper. I liked the sound of OK computer and the Bends. I thought they were ok rock songs and believe it or not liked Yorke’s voice as it went perfectly with the music. That’s all I judged it on and all I judged their subsequent music on.
But then I am as deep as a puddle.
I’m very much of the same opinion,I’m a simple soul who listens to a lot of music.
i either like or I don’t, if I really like what I hear then I will delve deeper.
As for this album I bought it on release after liking ‘The Bends’ not because of any of the reviews I read.There are plenty of musicians I don’t care for but I love their music.
I’m not a fan of Thom Yorke but that won’t influence my review of this album.
 
Thanks for reminding me that this album exists. Listened to it a lot around a decade ago. Never been a big fan of Radiohead but every now and again I’d see a fantastic live performance on tv and get back to listening to some of their stuff.

Like this album a lot, apart from a couple of tracks. Had it on loud in the car earlier and it still sounds good.
 
It's about a dystopian world, based on the situation at the time and I'd argue is still as relevant today in its themes as it was when it landed - which isn't often the case with an album. It's a complicated take, but it seems as though you're writing it off on the basis Yorke wanted to be a musician and comes from an affluent background as opposed to just listening to it. You're aiming your gun on the basis we've all read reviews and believed the hype, when you have read them alongside the bands bio and decided to use it against them.

It's also got to be commended that they didn't produce the Bends Part 2. Which is what they were told to do for commercial success. They fucked that off and did what they wanted to. Experimented, broke some rules and produced a brilliant album - albeit I preferred the Bends still.

Do you dismiss Erling Haaland as a footballer because he is the son of a former pro and has access to the best training? Some footballers can turn up and play, it's in them. Some footballers have to work their arse off. I wouldn't have found David Silva any less beautiful if I found out he'd had a private coach from the age he could walk.
It isn't about that, save for one song, which I'll get to in my review. If it was, that message would be clear. It's about that only in RETROSPECT. Ask the band: "Radiohead have said they do not consider OK Computer a concept album and did not intend to link the songs through a narrative or unifying concept while it was being written." It's a "complicated take" for those that love it because the intent they ascribe is and was not there -- a classic consumer vs. creator issue in art generally. @threespires has already nodded in the direction of this argument, and he's not wrong, nor am I. This is the crux of why we think it's overrated.

I am not writing it off because of Thom's background -- I don't think I'm writing it off, period -- though in some part my criticism is based on his background. I have a number of other thoughts on this issue which I will get to in my review.

It's lots easier to do what you want to do when you're already rich and popular. Ask The Beatles. I don't like The Bends either (musically), but I like it better because the songs are more personal. I dislike this because they aren't. And it's overrated because people have mistaken the impersonal nature of them as underscoring the universal sadness we all sometimes feel, rather than what I think -- the writing isn't very good, and/or Yorke doesn't really feel these things.

And I find the argument that's it's somehow anti-commercial LOL funny. This sounds like it sounds because, in the inimitable words of Spinal Tap's manager, "Death sells." Again, wait for my review, but there's a reason they buried "Fitter Happier" rather than opening with it as they planned, and that was ALL about commercial appeal.
 
Last edited:
It isn't about that, save for one song, which I'll get to in my review. If it was, that message would be clear. It's about that only in RETROSPECT. Ask the band: "Radiohead have said they do not consider OK Computer a concept album and did not intend to link the songs through a narrative or unifying concept while it was being written." It's a "complicated take" for those that love it because the intent they ascribe is and was not there -- a classic consumer vs. creator issue in art generally. @threespires has already nodded in the direction of this argument, and he's not wrong, nor am I. This is the crux of why we think it's overrated.

I am not writing it off because of entirely because of Thom's background -- I don't think I'm writing it off, period --though in some part my criticism is based on his background. I have a number of other thoughts on this issue which I will get to in my review.

It's lot easier to do what you want to do when you're already rich and popular. Ask The Beatles. I don't like The Bends either, but I like it better because the songs are more personal. I dislike this because they aren't. And it's overrated because people have mistaken the impersonal nature of them as underscoring the universal sadness we all sometimes feel, rather than what I think -- the writing isn't very good, and/or Yorke doesn't really feel these things.

And I find the argument that's it's somehow anti-commercial LOL funny. This sounds like it sounds because, in the inimitable words of Spinal Tap's manager, "Death sells." Again, wait for my review, but there's a reason they buried "Fitter Happier" rather than opening with it as they planned, and that was ALL about commercial appeal.

It's not about being anti-commercial, but they produced an album with a completely different sound to their previous one which was successful. Most bands get pushed to stick with the same sound or style in order to continue the commercial success. This was a massive departure. The album sold because people loved the Bends and therefore listened to it. If it was a shit album it could well have been the death of them (which they may well have enjoyed!), but people loved it.

In terms of the theme of the album and what it's about. I offered a simplistic overview, rather than a full review. Music is what you make of it. Depends on your mood and some songs strike a chord to some people and are like pulling teeth for others.

I look forward to seeing your review. You're owning your position which I respect, and fundamentally I don't believe it's Radiohead's best album. Although I also like some of their songs after this album which I'm sure puts me in a very small minority on here!

I don't think critics are seeing anything that isn't there. I look forward to your review though. There's no right or wrong answer here. I actually think Radiohead have done some brilliant songs since OK Computer where most people think that was the end of them!
 
It's not about being anti-commercial, but they produced an album with a completely different sound to their previous one which was successful. Most bands get pushed to stick with the same sound or style in order to continue the commercial success. This was a massive departure. The album sold because people loved the Bends and therefore listened to it. If it was a shit album it could well have been the death of them (which they may well have enjoyed!), but people loved it.

In terms of the theme of the album and what it's about. I offered a simplistic overview, rather than a full review. Music is what you make of it. Depends on your mood and some songs strike a chord to some people and are like pulling teeth for others.

I look forward to seeing your review. You're owning your position which I respect, and fundamentally I don't believe it's Radiohead's best album. Although I also like some of their songs after this album which I'm sure puts me in a very small minority on here!

I don't think critics are seeing anything that isn't there. I look forward to your review though. There's no right or wrong answer here. I actually think Radiohead have done some brilliant songs since OK Computer where most people think that was the end of them!
All fair enough!! Cheers mate.
 
Like Rob I can say that I have never listened to any Radiohead album in its entirety...and after my first listen to this I can honestly say that I dont think I have missed much. Nothing grabbed me, a couple of interesting tracks but I shall give it the required 2 extra listens.

Just had this image of @FogBlueInSanFran & @threespires being backed into a corner as the mob closes in...Butch & Sundance perhaps shot down in a blaze of Paranoid Android

Sadly I could pull off neither the rugged charm of Newman or the boyish good looks of Redford. I will however rejoin the fray later when time allows, hopefully later tonight.
 
I do not see the problem handing out a 9 and skipping 2 songs..
Beatles records are called classics despite having at least 2 duff songs on each lp.
 
I always think of Radiohead in a few stages
1) Stage One: they sound like everyone else. Pablo Honey is a baaaaad album - I bought it and liked it when it came out but by and large it is not good although the MTV live version of Creep where Thom jumps in the pool is incredibly if unintentionally funny
2) Stage Two: Everyone now sounds like Radiohead. The Bends was a super influential album but would the world have been better without it? No The Bends no Coldplay
3) Stage Three. Radiohead now sound like they hate Radiohead. OKC starts the trend of destroying their own mythos whilst simultaneously launching the careers of Radiohead conspiracy theorists who see significance in every fart
4) Stage Four. Radiohead learn to count past four and now everything is swinging. Mopey white guys have to learn what a time signature is.

I write this as a fan. They are really good. I don't need personal trauma expressed in every track - most people aren't interesting enough to do that on more than one album and if I was that bothered I'd listen to Taylor Swift or something. I don't need music to make me feel something. Radiohead write songs that I like and some of them I think are exceptional. Pablo Honey is trash though
 
The thing is. I love 'mopery'. I really do. I'm a right dour bastard at times.
What a great line and I can fully empathise with it. I mentioned in my review of the Manchester Orchestra that sometimes when that melancholy mood hits me I don’t look for music to lift me out of it, I almost luxuriate in the feeling.

There’s a few Radiohead tracks that would make my melancholy playlist. Similar to others I prefer the Bends to this and listened to some of the stuff that came later more out of a sense of obligation than enjoyment. Subsequent albums do have their moments but they can also feel a bit heavy going.

Obviously very divided opinions on this album between the lovers and haters. I wonder how many 5s, 6s and 7s we’ll get as opposed to the 1s and 10s
 
Some people are not allowed to like popular albums no matter how good they are. The "real" U2 fans claimed Zooraopa was better than Achtung Baby, and that the former was too commercial, but one stood the test of time and the other hasn't been played since 1993.

It is like people who only go to see films that Mark Kermode likes, not realising they are there for entertainment and nothing else, and you are allowed to like whatever you want.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.