Gareth Barry Conlon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 14,758
The technology debate is a difficult one.Not listened yet but wanted to step in and respond to this comment as it's an interesting discusssion.
The comment you make about your son and his pedal board vs other technology that I assume will be on display here is not accurate in my eyes. In the former case, a musician will be using pedals to assist in getting a certain sound from the guitar. This will happen in real time and still require the requisite level of skill to pull off.
Creating electronic music is also undoubtedly a skill - however, in this case, an artist (I won't necessarily assume a musician) has the luxury of a number of hours/days/weeks in the studio to achieve the required effect.
Given enough time, you or I or anybody else could probably produce a symphony on a music editing suite with little musical knowledge.
I don't know what to call the difference I am highlighting here, but let's call it the "human performance element". This is important to me when listening to music - like an artist singing their own material. These factors may not be important to others, but they are to me.
If I were to produce the world's best AI software package that could sing like the world's greatest vocalists across a number of genres, this would undoubtedly be extremely skilfull. But I certainly wouldn't consider myself worthy of praise in the music world - the praise I would expect would be from the technology world.
Agreed. I'm happy to have a broad range of music nominated on here.
As an example in terms of studio recording there is very little point in recording drums any more. There are a million drum samples and technology allows you to manipulate them all a million ways. And if a good drummer is one that keeps good time then the technology keeps perfect time.
But if you go down that road what is the point of doing anything live. But no one wants to end up like Ian Brown and his karaoke tour.