Been very busy this week, dig season is upon us all, so I'll keep this short and sweet.
I've listened to both albums, live and studio, to get the general feel of everything Embrace. This genre and band passed me by at the time what with being abroad working for most of the 90's and while there are bits of the original record I actually liked the general feel of it still doesn't resonate. Not really my thing.
The live album has a similar feel to it, not a faithful reproduction, but close enough. But it's all just a bit average to my old ears. Nothing new, nothing to grab me, nothing to make me sit up and listen.
I could take points away for the singing, which is quite poor, and the added production, including the suspiciously added stringed instruments. I could add points back in for the fans enjoyment. Singing along, clapping in the right bits, it's what a concert, for me, is all about. I want to enjoy myself especially if I've paid a lot of money for the privilege.
I've also have no idea why, if the original album resonated so well with Mark, he picked the inferior live version.
Still...a score...
The original album would have got a 5. The inferior live version gets a 4.