FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Not even for the sake of improvement?Can't be letting Joe go for any amount of money.
Not even for the sake of improvement?Can't be letting Joe go for any amount of money.
It's ridiculous money that we don't fucking need. For me some things transcend money, Joe Hart is one of them
Yeah, clever manager, unlike that gobshite we're after hiring that wants to get rid of Hart and sign Stones.Getting rid of Nevertons deadwood and nicking one of our best players
Not even for the sake of improvement?
Hopefully,within whatever budget we can afford,whoever Pep decides to purchase.Who would be an improvement? How much would they cost? Also, it would mean one less homegrown player.
Hopefully,within whatever budget we can afford,whoever Pep decides to purchase.
The HG factor would obviously be considered.
That's not my job pal,i have other responsibilities ;-)Thanks for the suggestion FI.
I thought you might actually have an idea of who you would feel, would be an improvement on Joe.
That's not my job pal,i have other responsibilities ;-)
So,onto whats relevant,please explain......If the new boss believes he can find a better keeper,why is that a bad thing?