Blue Streak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 2,459
Now this is obviously a topic for the older fans we have. I was born in 1975 so missed the two 70's teams but I'm really interested to hear the thoughts of those who saw all of this?
Firstly! was the Mercer/Allison team broken up to early? I know the politics at Maine Road at the time with Joe and Mal falling out and the influence of Swales didn't help and many people felt Francis Lee was sold before he should have been. Also the Marsh signing meant we missed out on the title in 71/72 when we should have won it. But what do people think?
The more interesting one for me actually is the breaking up of the late 70's team. Bringing Mal back and selling all the star players we did and replacing them with unknown quantities. How did people feel? did you/they believe in Swales and Mal selling off the crown jewels and replacing them or did people feel it was the wrong thing to do? I know a lot of people felt proud City could afford the million pound fees they were paying (although we ultimately suffered for it in the long run) but it was to the sacrifice of a lot of good international players. Had City reached a crossroads at the time and extensive surgery required or was it drastic action?
Basically was it too much to soon?
Firstly! was the Mercer/Allison team broken up to early? I know the politics at Maine Road at the time with Joe and Mal falling out and the influence of Swales didn't help and many people felt Francis Lee was sold before he should have been. Also the Marsh signing meant we missed out on the title in 71/72 when we should have won it. But what do people think?
The more interesting one for me actually is the breaking up of the late 70's team. Bringing Mal back and selling all the star players we did and replacing them with unknown quantities. How did people feel? did you/they believe in Swales and Mal selling off the crown jewels and replacing them or did people feel it was the wrong thing to do? I know a lot of people felt proud City could afford the million pound fees they were paying (although we ultimately suffered for it in the long run) but it was to the sacrifice of a lot of good international players. Had City reached a crossroads at the time and extensive surgery required or was it drastic action?
Basically was it too much to soon?