The Budget can someone explain

[BoyBlue_1985]

Ed Miliband was impressive yesterday, Cameron knoiws just how good he is, that's why they'll be no head to head. I've not clicked your link to the Daily Mail, but if you look to the Mail to back up your argument, then you've already lost.

If you're so myopic as to not read analysis you may not agree with them you're a thick c**t.

I read the Gurdian and New Statesman to read a different opinion. I guess you just like reading things you agree with. Bless.

And Ed was useless for all the reasons listed in the article.

Now run along, other grown ups may need to talk.

Like shooting fish in a barrel, you make it so easy.

You prove my point, yet again.

He pretty much done you there, then you sort of made it more obvious with your reply

 

[The perfect fumble]

If you're so myopic as to not read analysis you may not agree with them you're a thick c**t.

I read the Gurdian and New Statesman to read a different opinion. I guess you just like reading things you agree with. Bless.

And Ed was useless for all the reasons listed in the article.

Now run along, other grown ups may need to talk.

Like shooting fish in a barrel, you make it so easy.

You prove my point, yet again.

Go and do your homework, this is for grown ups

The New Statesmen, The Guardian, The Independent have a left wing slant, though they do not support Labour, being very critical of the party, with The New Statesman even having a regular slot for Simon Heffer and The Guardian urging readers to vote Lib Dem at the last election.

The Financial Times tells the truth to its class and The Times still has a dog in the race as a paper of note. The Telegraph is right wing, but has a modicum of decency when it comes to journalism...The Red Tops are tits and circuses.

That leaves the Daily Mail.

I read the Daily Mail online, the sports section is not bad, but the rest of the paper is just a wank sheet for the world according to Paul Dacre. The acid test is simply this, the link posted was to an article headlined....

SIMON HEFFER: How could any sane Labour voter not switch to the Tories?

And goes on to explain the...the disaster Ed Miliband produced yesterday.

Now, try to imagine any other headline in the Mail, imagine that Milband had been outstanding, try to imagine a Daily Mail headline ...

the triumph Ed Miliband produced yesterday

Of course, it's not possible, the Mail would never run with that headline even if it were true, you know this, so why should I believe yet another negative story about Miliband or Labour in the Mail? A few years back Balls screwed up his reply to a budget, I saw it, it was poor and all the papers reported it, but Miliband is getting generally positive reviews today, or no mention at all from most of the right wing press (which is praise of sorts). Only in the Mail is it a disaster, but of course, it's the Daily Mail.

That is why a link from the Mail on Miliband, with his two kitchens and a father that hated Britain, is laughable, to quote from the comments section under the article....

"There's no such thing as a sane Labour voter...they're swivel-eyed lefties, and deranged by nature...inherent buffoons"..

Of course!

PS: You didn't write that did you?

 

[Mustard Dave]

I was waiting patiently for a Budget thread all day yesterday.

I take it the lack of one from our plethora of RWNJs means even they are dumbfounded at how fucking shocking it actually was.

Osborne should have stuck to history.

Any chance you could explain any of that? In what way was it shocking?

 

[Mustard Dave]

What exactly is it that the Tories are doing I see it mentioned that they are borrowing more than we have before but we are reducing the defecit...

The way i understand it is that they are reducing our outgoings so that we have more coming in than we have going out, so currently there is no reduction in the national debt just a move to get us bringing in a profit so to speak.

Can someone in the know explain it all?

If you are Majorie and Ken from Kent you will be a bit better off, if you are Mike and Kelly from Blackley then god help you.

Any chance you could explain, as per my request above to the Chief of BM LWNJs?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Simon Heffer is an odious fat ****.

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

I think Norway have no debt, mainly because they did what we should of done and nationalised the oil
Bloody Nordic know it all bastards

 

[Ronnie the Rep]

Like shooting fish in a barrel, you make it so easy.

You prove my point, yet again.

Go and do your homework, this is for grown ups

The New Statesmen, The Guardian, The Independent have a left wing slant, though they do not support Labour, being very critical of the party, with The New Statesman even having a regular slot for Simon Heffer and The Guardian urging readers to vote Lib Dem at the last election.

The Financial Times tells the truth to its class and The Times still has a dog in the race as a paper of note. The Telegraph is right wing, but has a modicum of decency when it comes to journalism...The Red Tops are tits and circuses.

That leaves the Daily Mail.

I read the Daily Mail online, the sports section is not bad, but the rest of the paper is just a wank sheet for the world according to Paul Dacre. The acid test is simply this, the link posted was to an article headlined....

SIMON HEFFER: How could any sane Labour voter not switch to the Tories?

And goes on to explain the...the disaster Ed Miliband produced yesterday.

Now, try to imagine any other headline in the Mail, imagine that Milband had been outstanding, try to imagine a Daily Mail headline ...

the triumph Ed Miliband produced yesterday

Of course, it's not possible, the Mail would never run with that headline even if it were true, you know this, so why should I believe yet another negative story about Miliband or Labour in the Mail? A few years back Balls screwed up his reply to a budget, I saw it, it was poor and all the papers reported it, but Miliband is getting generally positive reviews today, or no mention at all from most of the right wing press (which is praise of sorts). Only in the Mail is it a disaster, but of course, it's the Daily Mail.

That is why a link from the Mail on Miliband, with his two kitchens and a father that hated Britain, is laughable, to quote from the comments section under the article....

"There's no such thing as a sane Labour voter...they're swivel-eyed lefties, and deranged by nature...inherent buffoons"..

Of course!

PS: You didn't write that did you?

Of course not. I read the speeches, looked at the budget, it's reasoning, and the responses and then made up my own mind. I am not driven by dogma, I thought Mr Milliband was poor. To be fair, that's partly because he hasn't got a decent answer to what Mr Osbourne has done.

 

[Paulpowersleftfoot]

I thought the reason why there was no budget thread was because there was nothing to reasonably complain about so the left footers were keeping a low profile?
No?

 

[The perfect fumble]

Go and do your homework, this is for grown ups

The New Statesmen, The Guardian, The Independent have a left wing slant, though they do not support Labour, being very critical of the party, with The New Statesman even having a regular slot for Simon Heffer and The Guardian urging readers to vote Lib Dem at the last election.

The Financial Times tells the truth to its class and The Times still has a dog in the race as a paper of note. The Telegraph is right wing, but has a modicum of decency when it comes to journalism...The Red Tops are tits and circuses.

That leaves the Daily Mail.

I read the Daily Mail online, the sports section is not bad, but the rest of the paper is just a wank sheet for the world according to Paul Dacre. The acid test is simply this, the link posted was to an article headlined....

SIMON HEFFER: How could any sane Labour voter not switch to the Tories?

And goes on to explain the...the disaster Ed Miliband produced yesterday.

Now, try to imagine any other headline in the Mail, imagine that Milband had been outstanding, try to imagine a Daily Mail headline ...

the triumph Ed Miliband produced yesterday

Of course, it's not possible, the Mail would never run with that headline even if it were true, you know this, so why should I believe yet another negative story about Miliband or Labour in the Mail? A few years back Balls screwed up his reply to a budget, I saw it, it was poor and all the papers reported it, but Miliband is getting generally positive reviews today, or no mention at all from most of the right wing press (which is praise of sorts). Only in the Mail is it a disaster, but of course, it's the Daily Mail.

That is why a link from the Mail on Miliband, with his two kitchens and a father that hated Britain, is laughable, to quote from the comments section under the article....

"There's no such thing as a sane Labour voter...they're swivel-eyed lefties, and deranged by nature...inherent buffoons"..

Of course!

PS: You didn't write that did you?

Of course not. I read the speeches, looked at the budget, it's reasoning, and the responses and then made up my own mind. I am not driven by dogma, I thought Mr Milliband was poor. To be fair, that's partly because he hasn't got a decent answer to what Mr Osbourne has done.

Fine, reasoning, I'm all for it. We may disagree, I'm sure we do, I saw a fine performance yesterday, you didn't, but what I balk at is the suggestion that you come to your conclusions by reasoning and an open mind whereas I, it seems, come to mine from blind dogma! Sound familiar? Well It's all very....

SIMON HEFFER: How could any sane Labour voter not switch to the Tories?

I don't back up my arguments with references to the Morning Star so excuse me if I take references to the Daily Mail with a pinch of salt.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Simon Heffer writing an article about Labour is akin to inviting Adolph Hitler to pen a piece on great Jewish artists and their influence on his career.