The Conservative Party

everyone avoids the dogs name - even better is there nobody in the Tories who can break off from the Covid enquiry bollocks psychodrama and point out that digging the dog up to house migrants is so off their message that they will be crucified in any election when Reform UK bring this up

www.bbc.com

Heritage warning over Dambusters' dog grave move - BBC News

Historic England says the grave should not be moved from Scampton because of its significance.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
 
....Just as Succession has completed.
Only trouble is, this fight for power leaves the majority of this country no better off.

Which one of them is Greg though...
 
dave_blue12 said:
Johnson has just thrown a hand grenade at Sunak by handing over his WhatsApp to the COVID Enquiry.

www.bbc.co.uk

Boris Johnson to bypass government on Covid WhatsApps

He has said he will give the Covid inquiry his messages in full, after the government refused to.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
He convienetly has a different phone to the one he used in 2020 which is the crucial bit , he knows what is on the old phone can destroy him, hope they get that phone and get his whatsapps off, in reality this i am handing it all over is utter bollocks
 
dave_blue12 said:
For what it’s worth.

View attachment 81554
Click to expand...

Worth fuck all mate - read the paragraph above the one headed NOTEBOOKS......... "so that I can search it for all the RELEVANT information"

He isn't doing what he is implying - he is proposing to retain control of what data is released and he will be the judge of that
 
section 35 inquiries act 2005 section relates to offences and sanctions. To be frank the likes of Johnson and Case should be under investigation and staring down the barrel of a maximum 51 weeks in Jail

35Offences​

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he fails without reasonable excuse to do anything that he is required to do by a notice under section 21.

(2)A person is guilty of an offence if during the course of an inquiry he does anything that is intended to have the effect of—

(a)distorting or otherwise altering any evidence, document or other thing that is given, produced or provided to the inquiry panel, or

(b)preventing any evidence, document or other thing from being given, produced or provided to the inquiry panel,

or anything that he knows or believes is likely to have that effect.

(3)A person is guilty of an offence if during the course of an inquiry—

(a)he intentionally suppresses or conceals a document that is, and that he knows or believes to be, a relevant document, or

(b)he intentionally alters or destroys any such document.

For the purposes of this subsection a document is a “relevant document” if it is likely that the inquiry panel would (if aware of its existence) wish to be provided with it.

(4)A person does not commit an offence under subsection (2) or (3) by doing anything that he is authorised or required to do—

(a)by the inquiry panel, or

(b)by virtue of section 22 or any privilege that applies.

(5)Proceedings in England and Wales or in Northern Ireland for an offence under subsection (1) may be instituted only by the chairman.

(6)Proceedings for an offence under subsection (2) or (3) may be instituted—

(a)in England and Wales, only by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions;

(b)in Northern Ireland, only by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland.

(7)A person who is guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level three on the standard scale or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding the relevant maximum, or to both.

(8)“The relevant maximum” is—

(a)in England and Wales, 51 weeks;

(b)in Scotland and Northern Ireland, six months.
 
Kirkstall Blue said:
Boris still thinks he is above the law of the land thousands died during the pandemic we all want an explanation. “Hand your phones over to the judge he will decide what’s relevant“
Click to expand...

sorry to be a pedant but the inquiry is headed by a she - but you are right the law clearly states everything goes to the inquiry and they decide whats included. I mean if you look at who is involved they will all have had top security clearance

covid19.public-inquiry.uk

About

This is the independent public inquiry set up to examine the UK’s response to and impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and learn lessons for the future. The Inquiry is Chaired by Baroness Heather Hallett, a former Court of Appeal judge. The Inquiry has been established under the Inquiries Act...
covid19.public-inquiry.uk covid19.public-inquiry.uk
 
I didn’t know it was a public inquiry that’s the last resort into the Covid debacle, he’s ducking and diving his way out of it.

Learning lessons such as reinstating the Offices dealing with public health and infectious diseases. PPE not being ready and people dying because they were busy partying in Downing Street.
We want the truth if they worked their socks off then co-operate with the inquiry,
 
Kirkstall Blue said:
I didn’t know it was a public inquiry that’s the last resort into the Covid debacle, he’s ducking and diving his way out of it.

Learning lessons such as reinstating the Offices dealing with public health and infectious diseases. PPE not being ready and people dying because they were busy partying in Downing Street.
We want the truth if they worked their socks off then co-operate with the inquiry,
Click to expand...


Lol .... how naive .... thinking that a tory can actually ''work their socks off '' ....... nothing but parasites on the working class.
 
Tongue in cheek “if they worked their socks off“ but innocent until proven …… this has all the hallmarks of a long drawn out inquiry the truth will be hidden in the official secrets act. I assume the PM and cabinet sign it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top