New Privileges Committee report released today.
https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/40679/documents/198237/default/
Mogg, Dorries, Fabricant, Patel, Jenkyns, Goldsmith, Jenkinson, Clarke-Smith, Lord Cruddas and Lord Greenhalgh all named as people trying to interfere with the work of the committee, and therefore being in contempt of Parliament.
c***sNew Privileges Committee report released today.
https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/40679/documents/198237/default/
Mogg, Dorries, Fabricant, Patel, Jenkyns, Goldsmith, Jenkinson, Clarke-Smith, Lord Cruddas and Lord Greenhalgh all named as people trying to interfere with the work of the committee, and therefore being in contempt of Parliament.
Court of Appeal pictures on the front page of the Mail tomorrow then as "Enemies of the People"?
They were criticised - the report didn’t find them to have been in contempt of Parliament. They didn’t make any such judgments.New Privileges Committee report released today.
https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/40679/documents/198237/default/
Mogg, Dorries, Fabricant, Patel, Jenkyns, Goldsmith, Jenkinson, Clarke-Smith, Lord Cruddas and Lord Greenhalgh all named as people trying to interfere with the work of the committee, and therefore being in contempt of Parliament.
It was a very, very close second.They were criticised - the report didn’t find them to have been in contempt of Parliament. They didn’t make any such judgments.
Good luck getting the SC to overrule their brother Judges on that one.Apparently the CoA have said Rwanda isn't a safe country.
This will doubtlessly be appealed by the govt to the Supreme Court.
Good luck getting the SC to overrule their brother Judges on that one.
Feel free to argue semantics all you want but if you read paragraphs 4 & 5 of the report where contempt of parliament is clearly defined, it’s clearly implicit within that report that those names were considered to have been in contempt of parliament.They were criticised - the report didn’t find them to have been in contempt of Parliament. They didn’t make any such judgments.
I’m not sure being in contempt of Parliament is something to be criticised for.Feel free to argue semantics all you want but if you read paragraphs 4 & 5 of the report where contempt of parliament is clearly defined, it’s clearly implicit within that report that those names were considered to have been in contempt of parliament.