The Conservative Party

inbetween said:
To be fair it is a problem but whether it's a big problem is just a point of view. I often read that we need to work with the EU but the EU hasn't been able to address their own problem in Europe either.

Basically there's no solution other than to ask whether it is actually a priority? It is currently costing us a fortune but that can be stopped because the biggest costs come down to choices.

The government has for example chosen to pay to put migrants in hotels because it refuses to process applications fast enough. Soon it will pay tons of money to both process applications and then send people to Rwanda.

They could quite easily change that policy, process applications 10x faster and not send people to Rwanda, the costs would be MUCH smaller because we wouldn't need hotels etc. We would have to accept 50,00 people per year but that's nothing in the grand scheme of immigration and until Rwanda comes into play we would still be accepting them all for the most part anyway.
Click to expand...


Exactly ........
 
inbetween said:
To be fair it is a problem but whether it's a big problem is just a point of view. I often read that we need to work with the EU but the EU hasn't been able to address their own problem in Europe either.

Basically there's no solution other than to ask whether it is actually a priority? It is currently costing us a fortune but that can be stopped because the biggest costs come down to choices.

The government has for example chosen to pay to put migrants in hotels because it refuses to process applications fast enough. Soon it will pay tons of money to both process applications and then send people to Rwanda.

They could quite easily change that policy, process applications 10x faster and not send people to Rwanda, the costs would be MUCH smaller because we wouldn't need hotels etc. We would have to accept 50,00 people per year but that's nothing in the grand scheme of immigration and until Rwanda comes into play we would still be accepting them all for the most part anyway.
Click to expand...
it is defo a small problem in the grand sceme of things, blown up as sunak made the mistake of making a pledge about it and now he has to spend a billion on it if you include the half a billion we are paying to france as well as what we are paying rwanda and legal costs , that is before adding in the hotel costs . Set up safe routes based in france and process the backlog so those who can stay can go to work . Dehumanising the poor people is not a good thing that the self proclamed empathetic party is doing
 
www.bbc.co.uk

Rishi Sunak vows to boost UK defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030

The PM says billions of extra spending will put the UK's defence industry on a "war footing".
www.bbc.co.uk

People may think this pointless gesturing as he will be out of office later this year but he could handcuff us with contracts for the next 5 years that would be difficult for the next government to break and also line the pockets of his mates.
 
Fred_Quimby said:
www.bbc.co.uk

Rishi Sunak vows to boost UK defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030

The PM says billions of extra spending will put the UK's defence industry on a "war footing".
www.bbc.co.uk

People may think this pointless gesturing as he will be out of office later this year but he could handcuff us with contracts for the next 5 years that would be difficult for the next government to break and also line the pockets of his mates.
Click to expand...

Unlikely. This pledge was made two years ago by Johnson. Sunak is just rehashing it and the funding will apparently come out of the R&D budget and other ‘savings’.

Like everything else it’s all hot air and bollocks. Not that we don’t need to increase our defence spending and capabilities, its just not going to happen with this Govt.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
One of the things that really fucks me off about Sunak is the way he conspicuously, repeatedly and tediously pontificates around a hierarchy of immigrants, implying his family did things ‘the right way’ compared to people who arrive here on boat crossings.

Given their ethnic origin, where they arrived into the UK from and the fact he went to Winchester School within less than two decade of their arrival, I’d be happy to lay a pound to a pinch of shit that his family weren’t uneducated and skint when they arrived in this country, unlike many of the poor souls trying to escape poverty and persecution who this **** wants to deport to Rwanda.

Fucking rat-faced ****.
Click to expand...

His parents were born in the UK. His grandmother and grandfather on his mums side were immigrants with his grandmother selling her wedding rings to fund their move.

Less is known about his father’s side, his father’s father was an accountant and his father’s parents emigrated to the UK (Liverpool) in 1966.

Uneducated no, skint? Maybe. Do you only advocate for an immigration policy that allows the skint and uneducated in?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.