Bluemanc100
Well-Known Member
Why would they have opposed the decision of the shareholders?The deal only went thru with HMG approval.
Why would they have opposed the decision of the shareholders?The deal only went thru with HMG approval.
Why would they have opposed the decision of the shareholders?
Security is the responsibility of those involved with the project.. nothing changesBecause of secret and sensitive material - they could be working on something for say RAF in flight refuelling - HMG will have helped with the funding now commercially sensitive and secret military info is in foreign hands and the shareholders benefit.
Because of secret and sensitive material - they could be working on something for say RAF in flight refuelling - HMG will have helped with the funding now commercially sensitive and secret military info is in foreign hands and the shareholders benefit.
The government would have to grant an export license to transfer the technology out of the UK or for someone who is not a UK citizen to view it.
Releasing anything to someone who isn't cleared is a breach of official secrets.
Even the guy who owns the company can't view it unless cleared.
There was a big argument about Corbyn releasing classified trade information for political gain which was technically a breach of official secrets.
Licence.The government would have to grant an export license to transfer the technology out of the UK or for someone who is not a UK citizen to view it.
Releasing anything to someone who isn't cleared is a breach of official secrets.
Even the guy who owns the company can't view it unless cleared.
There was a big argument about Corbyn releasing classified trade information for political gain which was technically a breach of official secrets.
Its anonymisedI see they are further negotiating with private business to get hold of all our NHS data.
good job I withdrew my permission for it be held centrally when I had the chance a few years ago.