johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 12,419
There’s loads round here too.Exactly. There's about 5 Turkish barbers within 5 minutes of me that are open 7 days a week, morning til night, with fuck all customers. If I can see what's going on why can't the police?
They really do just need taking out. No questions asked.This is the area where I totally support the police. Absolute scum that needs extermination. We need firing squads and I will sign up.
I am a liberal leftie and I agree.They really do just need taking out. No questions asked.
100%. Slotted. Mossad-style.They really do just need taking out. No questions asked.
Really? How did you know? Internet I guessTopped himself apparently. Sad
The jury system is flawed in these cases in my opinion. The judge for me. I have seen it with my own experience.Finished it. I didn’t expect that at the end of the credits. That poor young man. I hope he went knowing he was the good guy. The world wants him more than these savage huns.
Made me extremely angry that programme.
Finished it. I didn’t expect that at the end of the credits. That poor young man. I hope he went knowing he was the good guy. The world wants him more than these savage huns.
Made me extremely angry that programme.
Something was released in the program that potentially identified a witness/ informant and put them in danger and they complained etcCould you reiterate it please?
Paris BostockParis, wasn't it?
Some cunts don’t know there’s such a thing as spoilersI guess I shouldn’t have looked back on here until after the 3rd episode has aired for me tomorrow.
It’s referred to as adverse inference..as with the caution if you later use a defence in court that you could have mentioned at the time the court can consider why didn’t you say it at the time and take it into account when considering the evidenceThe ‘no comment’ to every question these scumbags are asked is just bollox. Wtf is all that about. There must be a way to use this against them in court to deter them from just spouting that bs to every question??
The ‘no comment’ to every question these scumbags are asked is just bollox. Wtf is all that about. There must be a way to use this against them in court to deter them from just spouting that bs to every question??
However it doesn’t seem to carry the weight it should in my opinionIt’s referred to as adverse inference..as with the caution if you later use a defence in court that you could have mentioned at the time the court can consider why didn’t you say it at the time and take it into account when considering the evidence