If that's true then that's a dogshit decision. Would be absolutely gutted for Pantillimon.Fazz28 said:hart to start according to espn
If that's true then that's a dogshit decision. Would be absolutely gutted for Pantillimon.Fazz28 said:hart to start according to espn
stony said:minnesota blue said:Fazz28 said:hart to start according to espn
Better be a good explanation if true.
Pants has said he's going, so what's the point of keeping him sweet. Play your best keeper and that's Hart.
bluemathlady said:@BluePhil8 said:If Mancini plays Hart it tells me there is substance to the Pelligrini rumours.
Thats what Im thinking too. "What does it matter now that Im going"
stony said:minnesota blue said:Fazz28 said:hart to start according to espn
Better be a good explanation if true.
Pants has said he's going, so what's the point of keeping him sweet. Play your best keeper and that's Hart.
2+2 = Exaggeration@BluePhil8 said:If Mancini plays Hart it tells me there is substance to the Pelligrini rumours.
pudge said:2+2 = Exaggeration@BluePhil8 said:If Mancini plays Hart it tells me there is substance to the Pelligrini rumours.
@BluePhil8 said:If Mancini plays Hart it tells me there is substance to the Pelligrini rumours.
Yeah im going so i'll use my best goalkeeper in a cup final....bluemathlady said:@BluePhil8 said:If Mancini plays Hart it tells me there is substance to the Pelligrini rumours.
Thats what Im thinking too. "What does it matter now that Im going"
This. I thought he was going to play on merit.minnesota blue said:It's not about keeping Pants happy. It's about doing the right fucking thing.