The FTSE

IG's regular charges for what were in effect dormant funds and shares is the reason I closed that account although I believe that fees are waived if you complete a set number of trades. I can live with a fee per trade but it's a question of scale. A £10 fee is a significant percentage of a trade worth a few hundred poundls or less but a bigger buy it's ;ess of an issue. If the stock or fund does well that initial charge is easily compensated for. If a share bombs then you've lost more than your initial fee.
Same reason I closed my IG account.

Ha ha, you must be dealing in larger amounts than me! It wasn’t worth the deal fee for me. Plus I‘ll sometimes average in, and take some profit/loss on a proportion of a position, so the fees would soon be adding up. Hence me being a convert to 212.
 
Personally if you’re only trading small amounts I’d use Trading 212. Companies like AJ Bell, HL & IG index charge fees each time you want to deal. If it’s shares it’s normally about £10 per trade depending on how much you deal.

I had an account with IG index a while back and was also being charged £20 a quarter.

Trading 212 doesn’t have the dealing or account fees. For someone starting out I’d recommend it. The app is decent too.

If you are thinking of opening Trading 212, then use this link and we’ll both get a feee share!

www.trading212.com/invite/GIEZX1U1

I’ve moved away from the other platforms mentioned above and now use 212.
Thanks for that info, out of interest before I click and read the links, can you buy into funds as well as a shares using the 212 account?
 
Hey worsley, I retire in 3 years, so surely I should up my pension contributions. I'm sitting on £130k paying £125 per month. With the Prudential. What you think?
Just bumping this question as I'd like the mod in waitings opinion on this please?
Any thoughts appreciated Mr w?
 
Thanks for that info, out of interest before I click and read the links, can you buy into funds as well as a shares using the 212 account?

Do you know what it is you want to invest in?

They have hundreds of exchange traded funds. So you can invest in the funds that aim to track indexes such as the FTSE, S&P etc via the stock exchange, if that’s what you want. There are hundred of others ETF’s available such as gold, oil, property.

They don’t do funds in the traditional sense where you pay in x amount each month, and if you want to get your money out you have to wait a day. If that’s what you’re after somewhere like Vanguard might be better.
 
Just bumping this question as I'd like the mod in waitings opinion on this please?
Any thoughts appreciated Mr w?
I'll state the obvious but with those figures I wouldn't be retiring in 3 years.

I would be looking to pay all I could in the pension or AVCs to avoid tax if I had to retire in 3 years, even if it meant taking a small loan to cover living costs, and take home minumum wage for the 3 years (which is the restriction on mine).
 
As I understand it, actively managed funds do worse in the long term on average than index funds though. And it also seems like there's no real way of distinguishing between skill and luck in deciding which is a well-managed fund.

What sort of return is everyone typically getting annually?
Depends if you wish to reduce volatility and increase diversification to be fair. I do like ETFs as part and parcel of a portfolio but they’re far too high risk for most people to have as the sole asset within a pension or investment. FCA agrees with me as well. Most balanced investors (circa 88% of investors) should only have 40-60% exposure to equities.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.