The Harry Kane Team 2017/18

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am convinced Spurs have no ambition under Levy, I wasnt aware he was in charge when Modric went, or Bale, players had they kept who would be making a decent team right now. I would have expected them to keep players like that and build on it, but Walker is another example, they see the money and take it without really replacing what they lost.

They are a feeder club imo, they wont achieve anything under Levy with his slow build of the club approach and if they do Kane will be approaching 30
 
I am convinced Spurs have no ambition under Levy, I wasnt aware he was in charge when Modric went, or Bale, players had they kept who would be making a decent team right now. I would have expected them to keep players like that and build on it, but Walker is another example, they see the money and take it without really replacing what they lost.

They are a feeder club imo, they wont achieve anything under Levy with his slow build of the club approach and if they do Kane will be approaching 30
Levy and Wenger would have been a match made in heaven....
 
I am convinced Spurs have no ambition under Levy, I wasnt aware he was in charge when Modric went, or Bale, players had they kept who would be making a decent team right now. I would have expected them to keep players like that and build on it, but Walker is another example, they see the money and take it without really replacing what they lost.

They are a feeder club imo, they wont achieve anything under Levy with his slow build of the club approach and if they do Kane will be approaching 30

To be fair Levy got both Modric and Bale to stay at WHL for a season after they first wanted to leave and in the end they were sold to RMFC for big money. They weren't the only club that found Real impossible to fend off ...
 
I am convinced Spurs have no ambition under Levy, I wasnt aware he was in charge when Modric went, or Bale, players had they kept who would be making a decent team right now. I would have expected them to keep players like that and build on it, but Walker is another example, they see the money and take it without really replacing what they lost.

They are a feeder club imo, they wont achieve anything under Levy with his slow build of the club approach and if they do Kane will be approaching 30

You must either be very young or forgotten how things once were. It takes time to move up even a few places in normal circumstances. Players leave all the time. Whoever you are. Even the Yankees, the Cowboys, Chelsea and Barca lose players.

I would say that Levy has the grandest of the grand plans. To build the best facilities in the World, to use them to finance a team capable of competing with the best in the World, to win the London NFL franchise, to sell to Facebook and then use their reach to turn Spurs into one of the biggest sports brand in the World.

Whether it is realistic is another matter. But to say Levy lacks ambition is wrong.
 
You must either be very young or forgotten how things once were. It takes time to move up even a few places in normal circumstances. Players leave all the time. Whoever you are. Even the Yankees, the Cowboys, Chelsea and Barca lose players.

I would say that Levy has the grandest of the grand plans. To build the best facilities in the World, to use them to finance a team capable of competing with the best in the World, to win the London NFL franchise, to sell to Facebook and then use their reach to turn Spurs into one of the biggest sports brand in the World.

Whether it is realistic is another matter. But to say Levy lacks ambition is wrong.
Levy has no ambition for Spurs is what I said. I do remember how things once were, though I am not sure what that has to do with it, they have always been a top six club (Give or take) and nothing has changed. In fact Levy latest comments about not want to buy big and to invest from within convinces me even more.
They need to invest like City and take the risk.
 
Levy has no ambition for Spurs is what I said. I do remember how things once were, though I am not sure what that has to do with it, they have always been a top six club (Give or take) and nothing has changed. In fact Levy latest comments about not want to buy big and to invest from within convinces me even more.
They need to invest like City and take the risk.

Again you seem to forget the privileged position City find themselves in.

Spurs simply do not have the £200m+ that City can invest in players. Particularly as Spurs have just borrowed £400m to invest in their stadium.

As for always being a top six club, after Sugar had finished with them, Spurs they were lower to mid table strugglers.

Levy has taken them back to the top 6 or 7 but Spurs still have far less resources available than the other top six sides and Everton.
 
Again you seem to forget the privileged position City find themselves in.

Spurs simply do not have the £200m+ that City can invest in players. Particularly as Spurs have just borrowed £400m to invest in their stadium.

As for always being a top six club, after Sugar had finished with them, Spurs they were lower to mid table strugglers.

Levy has taken them back to the top 6 or 7 but Spurs still have far less resources available than the other top six sides and Everton.

Take your point about Levy bringing stability and top six, but I mainly think that is Pochentino, though it probably comes from Levy's stable approach to things.

But City's privelge has nothing to do with it, and I dont expect Spurs to spend £200m. I do expect them (After nearly achieving last season) to build on the good team/manager they have. Instead they sell their best fb and the owners is talking about not buying big money players.... It just feels like spurs through and through, always going to be mid table.
 
Levy has no ambition for Spurs is what I said. I do remember how things once were, though I am not sure what that has to do with it, they have always been a top six club (Give or take) and nothing has changed. In fact Levy latest comments about not want to buy big and to invest from within convinces me even more.
They need to invest like City and take the risk.

Spurs have not always been a top six club.

They were relegated in 1977.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.