the hypocrisy of other fans in regards to city's spending.

Why do you care? If it wouldn't be spending they will come up with something else. Fact is, no top club fans love other teams that are competing with them. You won't see rags liking us, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea or any other combination. Fans are dumb. I still laugh when people say that they can't wait till Roman fucks off and Chelsea will be shit bottom team like they used to, even though in reality Chelsea without Roman are top 10 in revenue in world
 
Just remember one thing:

The fact that our success comes from a rich benefactor rather than more 'organically' makes utd fans in particular hate it even more. It is making them even more bitter about it than they otherwise would be, which is fantastic.

I have come to realise that there is no point trying to engage in a debate with them pointing out that this was the only way that a big underachieving club like us, Everton or Villa could have hoped to have broken into the self-perpetuating cartel that was the 'sky 4'. Or that the way football's finances are structured is anti-competitive and that they were one of the main driving forces behind that, for their own naked self-interest. Or that revenue generation due to effective marketing of your club in Asia leading to a greater capacity to buy players and therefore success is, when you think about it, fuck all to do with sport and therefore an absurd basis upon which to allow success on the pitch to be dictated. All of these things demonstrate that football isn't fair in terms of how it is set up financially.

So you know what? I don't bother using these things to conduct an argument anymore. It's a waste of time. I just tell them how much I'm fucking loving it and how much pain they are going to endure seeing us dominate football for the next ten years.

It might not win you any argument but let's be honest that was never going to happen anyway. What it does is piss them off far, far more than trying to reason with them. And for me, that makes not winning the debate with them a price worth paying.
 
Bucharest Blue said:
Would be good to see a chart with total expenditure on transfers for say over the last 10 years for all Prem clubs.. Could be interesting reading..

Anyone fancy digging that out ?

Here, plus lot of other spending charts. I'd be interested to see a similar chart with a) normal inflation factored in and b) football transfer inflation factored in (for example, the rags paid £27.5m 9 years ago for ferdinand and £3.75m for Keane in '93).

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league- ... -2011.html</a>

Interestingly, we have spent less than chelsea now from 1992 - 2011 and 2003-2011, we only overtake their spending from 2006-2011.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.