What I don't understand is, if we're so keen on Lescott, why didn't we include Jo as part of some kind of deal before he signed another years loan. Real pathetic decision just to let him go, and then start targeting one of their players...
The JO loan deal.
- Thread starter mct
- Start date
Uwe Rosler
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,579
AntMcfc said:
do you not think the club would have discussed this, or your just a lot smarter than them?!!
ConnorMCFC
Well-Known Member
im not sure, but i know hes cuptied?
Cambridgeblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,522
Moebius said:
And I do that mathS again if I were you.
skybluekings
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 1,234
Cambridgeblue said:
Errrr. Its a singular case. So "math" was the correct choice...not "maths"
I'd do the "english" again if I were you :D
mcigo said:Moebius said:
haha quality.
I think not.
Read again. We are not paying 66% of the wages, everton are according to whats been posted. Johnmc posted we were paying 66%. (and has said fair enough since)
People trying to make other people look stupid, how about you read the whole thread, unless you think everton paying 40k out of 60k is nearly is only 30% of the wage.
Sheikh n Bake
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Sep 2005
- Messages
- 1,837
Moebius said:mcigo said:haha quality.
I think not.
Read again. We are not paying 66% of the wages, everton are according to whats been posted. Johnmc posted we were paying 66%. (and has said fair enough since)
People trying to make other people look stupid, how about you read the whole thread, unless you think everton paying 40k out of 60k is nearly is only 30% of the wage.
woah hold on matey, it was aimed at johnmc. not you!