the mad ex. Part 356...

Y Y

york away to this!

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Messages
10,745
just posting on the moving house stress thread made me start this one...

five years ago the sillycow ended my marriage and moved out.

we split the children 50/50, half the week each.

met and moved in with the beautiful mrs This! three and a half years ago to much huffing and puffing because we moved from one part of the borough to another (15 to 20 min drive) and claims that we were not giving the children a permanent home because we were renting

we went through mediation and divorce a year and a half ago and agreed all aspects of money and childcare before the courts

married the beautiful mrs this! at the end of last year

my father died recently enabling me to pay back my recession debts and the beautiful mrs This!, all the children and I have just moved in to a bought house in the same village but a little closer to the town boundary - now about a ten min drive between houses, close to the met, school bus to new secondary school for eldest This! goes from outside the house etc etc.

Sillycow has now appointed barristers in London to apply to take the children away from me most of the time...

My question is - why?

answers on a postcard please...
 
Going purely from what you've said and taking everything you've said to be true, its just simple old fashioned jealousy.
You didn't fall apart when she left you and have actually prospered without her. She doesn't like it.
 
Maybe it's just a money issue?

The basic principle of how the CSA works is that the longer you have your children with you the less you pay.

Her allegiances are not with you anymore but with herself and in my experience many women just chase the cash after a certain time of separation <Yeah i'm an old cynic>

Other than that she's been eating mushrooms.
 
york away to this! said:
just posting on the moving house stress thread made me start this one...

five years ago the sillycow ended my marriage and moved out.

we split the children 50/50, half the week each.

met and moved in with the beautiful mrs This! three and a half years ago to much huffing and puffing because we moved from one part of the borough to another (15 to 20 min drive) and claims that we were not giving the children a permanent home because we were renting

we went through mediation and divorce a year and a half ago and agreed all aspects of money and childcare before the courts

married the beautiful mrs this! at the end of last year

my father died recently enabling me to pay back my recession debts and the beautiful mrs This!, all the children and I have just moved in to a bought house in the same village but a little closer to the town boundary - now about a ten min drive between houses, close to the met, school bus to new secondary school for eldest This! goes from outside the house etc etc.

Sillycow has now appointed barristers in London to apply to take the children away from me most of the time...

My question is - why?

answers on a postcard please...
Click to expand...


This (no pun Intended) is because the ex Mrs This, is displaying rag tendencies, she's bitter and twisted you have moved on without her and she's even more bitter and twisted because of your recent success.
 
dazdon said:
Maybe it's just a money issue?

The basic principle of how the CSA works is that the longer you have your children with you the less you pay.

Her allegiances are not with you anymore but with herself and in my experience many women just chase the cash after a certain time of separation <Yeah i'm an old cynic>

Other than that she's been eating mushrooms.
Click to expand...

This.

My ex was getting maintenance for 10 years then decided to stop the kid coming as often as he was then Bang CSA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.