Yeah, I'll get right on that.
Yeah you should, maybe it will encourage you to have a bit of a sing song next time you're in the Etihad, instead of sitting on your arse with your arms folded like 90% of the crowd...
Yeah, I'll get right on that.
Ouch! I'm still tryin' to work out the ciphered user name. Ahh..got it... Enigma says...COCKWOMBLE.Yeah you should, maybe it will encourage you to have a bit of a sing song next time you're in the Etihad, instead of sitting on your arse with your arms folded like 90% of the crowd...
Have the kids broken up for half term already?!Yeah you should, maybe it will encourage you to have a bit of a sing song next time you're in the Etihad, instead of sitting on your arse with your arms folded like 90% of the crowd...
The 90's were Celtics worst years, and the attendences did slip, however 47,000 isn't bad for 1996/97 considering we had'nt won the league for 8 seasons and Rangers won their 9th in a row to equal our record, City's attendances have not "always been bigger" not by a long shot, on average they have but stats don't always tell the whole story as I have pointed out.
Yeah you should, maybe it will encourage you to have a bit of a sing song next time you're in the Etihad, instead of sitting on your arse with your arms folded like 90% of the crowd...
If he was sat there 23 years ago, he was sat in the middle of a derelict iron works.It certainly wasn't 13 I would know if he said 13 years and not 23 and it was definitely 23 years.