BoyBlue_1985 said:
Wilf Wild 1937 said:
i kne albert davy said:
Don't really think she as to act famous to be honest what with being probably the most famous and recognised woman in the World, and when I was in the states in the early 80s and they were telling me how great Thatcher was as a British leader I took great pride in telling them how my leader lived in a big palace in London and ruled by divine right not the votes of a minority of the public.
When I lived there in the early '90s I also told them the truth about Thatcher.
When they knew how large parts of British industry had been destroyed by her their views changed.
I did always though side with them on the Republic v Monarchy issue. It always makes me laugh that
people in this country think Americans yearn for a Monarchy, when they fought for Independence
from, it just because a few eccentrics fly over for Royal Weddings etc .
Are you sure that's what independence was about?
If you look back at the events surrounding the "American Revolution" then most people assume it was
all about "no taxation without representation" but it was actually more complex than that. There had
already been "Americans" in the House of Lords although they had all come to live in England. When
war looked imminent the British Government offered the Americans seats in the House of Commons
on a similar basis as to how they were allocated in Britain at the time. How this would have worked
given the distances involved I don't know but it was proposed .The rebels, who weren't universally
supported in America, rejected this proposal on the grounds that they wanted a true democracy.
Interestingly enough when Washington and his mates, helped by the French, achieved power they
didn't create a true democracy. Not only were blacks and women excluded but large sections of
the white male population as well. Going back to the "taxation" issue the average American was
on twice the wage of the average wage in Britain at the time and the "taxation" was primarily to
be used for military spending to defend America from foreign (presumably French) threats. The rebels
deemed this threat not to be real since the French had already been driven out of Canada and
indeed they became their principle ally. If I'm to speculate I would say that there probably would have
been fears amongst the Americans (especially the business community) that if there was a large
American funded "British" military presence within America then punitive taxation may have followed.
I'm guessing that this military presence would probably have included significant numbers of
Americans in the pay of the Crown. The Crown was a very emotive issue at the time.