But you won't find the likes of Orla Guerin telling you that. In fact very few media outlets will report the truth of what happens in Gaza. They mainly rely on the Hamas PR machine to feed them the stories that they then report on without bothering to check the facts.Same sort of thing at Kings College when the former Navy & Shin Bet head, Ami Ayalon, spoke there. He's pretty much anti-expansionist and very much on the side of peace yet the pro-Palestinians tried to disrupt the meeting. Had they engaged in debate, they might have heard things that gave them some encouragement yet all they're interested in is shouting people down.
One thing Ayalon said (and he's met with most of the leading Palestinians) is that there are more Palestinian activists imprisoned by Hamas than by Israel.
Thank you for proving my point. Were you outside the CFA when the Chinese President was there to protest against their illegal occupation and ethnic cleansing of Tibet?Good. The more people that treat the state of Israel and its mouthpieces and apologists like the international pariah they should be for their ethnic cleansing, and illegal occupation for 48 years and their theft of land through settlements, the better. We might actually get some justice for the Palestinian people then.
Thank you for proving my point. Were you outside the CFA when the Chinese President was there to protest against their illegal occupation and ethnic cleansing of Tibet?Good. The more people that treat the state of Israel and its mouthpieces and apologists like the international pariah they should be for their ethnic cleansing, and illegal occupation for 48 years and their theft of land through settlements, the better. We might actually get some justice for the Palestinian people then.
Oh come now. It may while away a very average Friday night.Nothing good can come of this thread!
Oh come now. It may while away a very average Friday night.
Thank you for proving my point. Were you outside the CFA when the Chinese President was there to protest against their illegal occupation and ethnic cleansing of Tibet?
Thought not. His name isn't Goldberg.
I don't know what point you made that you think I've proved.
The point about Tibet/China is entirely irrelevant and is the usual deflection technique you and the other self-confessed Zionists on here use whenever somebody criticises Israel. The OP posted about issues relating to Israel/Palestine. If somebody starts a thread about Tibet/China I will comment about that issue in that thread.
Your point about Goldberg is another tactic heavily employed on here whenever Israel is criticised, which is to attempt to smear the poster as anti-Semitic. Most intelligent people see through this tactic and recognise that criticism of the state of Israel is not criticism of Jews or Judaism.
A Zionist being someone that believes a state of Israel should exist?I don't know what point you made that you think I've proved.
The point about Tibet/China is entirely irrelevant and is the usual deflection technique you and the other self-confessed Zionists on here use whenever somebody criticises Israel. The OP posted about issues relating to Israel/Palestine. If somebody starts a thread about Tibet/China I will comment about that issue in that thread.
Your point about Goldberg is another tactic heavily employed on here whenever Israel is criticised, which is to attempt to smear the poster as anti-Semitic. Most intelligent people see through this tactic and recognise that criticism of the state of Israel is not criticism of Jews or Judaism.
I`m not on the Guinness tonight,so at least I wont be posting.Either that or it will give some the night off lol.
The point is that you are free to criticise whoever you want. That's the essence of free speech. But you feel that Jews who support Israel shouldn't have that right yet are vocal in your criticism of Israel. Intimidation of venues that allow Jewish groups to hold meetings is reminiscent of Nazi Germany and I would hope that, whatever ones views on Israel that you would condemn any such action. Yet you laud it.I don't know what point you made that you think I've proved.
The point about Tibet/China is entirely irrelevant and is the usual deflection technique you and the other self-confessed Zionists on here use whenever somebody criticises Israel. The OP posted about issues relating to Israel/Palestine. If somebody starts a thread about Tibet/China I will comment about that issue in that thread.
Your point about Goldberg is another tactic heavily employed on here whenever Israel is criticised, which is to attempt to smear the poster as anti-Semitic. Most intelligent people see through this tactic and recognise that criticism of the state of Israel is not criticism of Jews or Judaism.
He doesn't mean that though. He uses it as code.A Zionist being someone that believes a state of Israel should exist?
I think you'll find that's most people in the world. Certainly all people that aren't antisemites.