Prestwich_Blue said:
I thought this must be a load of bollox and a wind-up but I've had the letter as well. However, you need to give PF some credit.
Strictly & legally speaking, no-one is allowed to stand persistently and the ground (or at least parts of it) could be shut if the Football Licencing Authority chose to enforce the law. However it's been recognised by the club that they can't really enforce it and they have taken a much more pragmatic approach in the last few seasons.
First it was the South Stand then 110/111. . It spread to 109 where I sit last season as more people moved to that end of the ground. However if you sit (stand?) in 109/110/111/116/117 then you should know what to expect and that is people will be standing. So I'd be surprised if there were a huge volume of complaints from those areas.
But City have to be seen to enforce the law and I've been present at discussions on the subject of standing and PF has said he will turn a blind eye but there are risks in that approach. If City are seen to be condoning it then they will get into trouble so they will make a tiken effort I imagine, in order to satisfy the authorities and things will go back to normal. So I would suggest people chill out and see this for what it is, which is effectively the club being seen to take a stand (no pun intended).
Of course the answer is to give people the choice as to whether they stand ior not and, if they choose to do so, do it in a way that reduces any inherent risks.
Whilst I fully know it's actually a law that you're supposes to sit down at the footy, that law was brought in in a knee-jerk, jump-the-gun overreaction. Liverpool fans still don't want safe standing yet 12500 fans stand up every single game in the Kop. They are the reason for the problem, they argue against safe standing (which is far safer than standing with the seats as they are now) yet stand at every match.
If they can, everyone in the country can stand!