The Stones Goal

[Keeper!]

Nunes looked happy :-)

Just about to say the same, time the guy was given starts, he brings so much to our midfield that we have not got.

Another like Grealish when fired up are top draw.

 

[bluenova]

Has there ever been 2 incidents like these (yesterday and Arse goal against us) where the reporting is completely different.

Gary O'Neil should take a look at the scrutiny all our goals receive to try and rule out them out.

Apparently on the MNC, even though there was nothing wrong with the goal and Bernardo was not interfering with play from an off side position (Rory's words) we still managed to find a loophole that should be closed!

Sound familiar, Villa HOME (my error updated) a couple of years ago.

Clearly nothing will change from the goal on Sunday, as the 'loophole' would affect half the corners we see every week. We regularly get these 'interfering' goals, and there are a handful each season that are much more worthy of debate that the Silva one.

Just a comment on the Villa 'loophole' though. It's not all one way. PGMOL's response to the Bruno/Rashford goal was the same. They said it was technically onside, but that in the future, due to the reaction across football, similar goals shouldn't be given.

 

[andthesunshineband]

Bern was jostling with the keeper most of the game, which they seemed to take in good part? Anyone notice the one when the keeper pinched Bern's ear? If we're having a talking stupid contest, should that have been penalised?

 

[give it to gordon]

Bern was jostling with the keeper most of the game, which they seemed to take in good part? Anyone notice the one when the keeper pinched Bern's ear? If we're having a talking stupid contest, should that have been penalised?

Yep saw that lol

 

[wagonman]

It reported it was a goal in the Pink...

JJ

 

[ancoats]

Has there ever been 2 incidents like these (yesterday and Arse goal against us) where the reporting is completely different.

Gary O'Neil should take a look at the scrutiny all our goals receive to try and rule out them out.

Apparently on the MNC, even though there was nothing wrong with the goal and Bernardo was not interfering with play from an off side position (Rory's words) we still managed to find a loophole that should be closed!

Sound familiar, Villa HOME (my error updated) a couple of years ago.

Its Boiled Piss again,
But the truth is that the goal is NOT offside, OR Silva fouled the keeper, But Skysports will spend hours debating it,
No other club gets so much airtime on Skysports with the panel debating if we have cheated again, forget all the records and the winning titles and cups, 4 in a row, 5 in a year, It's always the negative and cheat claims.

Did anybody think, "Here we go, when it went to VAR?" City beat the Premier League in court, and it could be payback time. I said straight away GOAL, but knew anything could happen after the court case win

 

[lionheart]

The idiot has spoken...

MSN

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

The idiot has spoken...

MSN

Funny, but I don't remember this whopper coming out in defence of Ederson when Gabriel scored in the 2-2 v the Arse.

The general consensus from the MSM was 'Ederson needed to be stronger'.

 

[eversince 76]

Not offside.
Not hindering the goalkeeper when the ball hit Stones on his head.
No Wolves player reacting esp their goalkeeper did nowt.

We totally deserved it. We have to do better though. And we will do so.
Wolves deserved very little. Defending like two doubledeck busses is not my kind of football.

 

[Roachy]

Not offside.
Not hindering the goalkeeper when the ball hit Stones on his head.
No Wolves player reacting esp their goalkeeper did nowt.

We totally deserved it. We have to do better though. And we will do so.
Wolves deserved very little. Defending like two doubledeck busses is not my kind of football.

Agree. Don't like conceding the first goal (or any for that matter) like we keep doing either. I think it might take until after the Nov international break to get a proper rhythm.