sorry chaps - all was going swimmingly until 85 minutes then we gave the rags three chances - we all know what happened next FFSI have been away with work in India for 3 of the last 4 weeks meaning the last time I saw City live we were still on a long unbeaten streak, the 1-0 Southamption game - but I'm back in the ground tomorrow for the first time since - I'm hoping normal service will resume against the rags!
I have always had a sceptical view of a lot of this so called data analysis. If it is saying that the current performances are not too bad I now convinced it is a load of bollox. I won't be reading the article thank-you.That's spot on.
This team is not finished. 3-4 wins plus 1-2 quality new players in January could make a big difference for the rest of the season.
The main reason why many don't see the good things in our game, e.g., vs Palace and Juventus, is the outcome bias: a bad result means a bad performance. Several bad results mean the team is finished, Pep is finished, Txiki did a poor job, etc. Sometimes shit happens, we are unlucky and the results are bad.
Pep's main mistake in the preparation for this season is relying on Stones and Ake to stay fit. Their injuries make it difficult for the other defenders, as these are overplayed and get injuries or lose form. We need a new CB.
It works the other way too. We were winning and playing pretty terribly at the start of the season. We've been bad all season really.I have always had a sceptical view of a lot of this so called data analysis. If it is saying that the current performances are not too bad I now convinced it is a load of bollox. I won't be reading the article thank-you.
We probably wouldn't beat Southampton or Wolves if we had to play them in the next month.I have always had a sceptical view of a lot of this so called data analysis. If it is saying that the current performances are not too bad I now convinced it is a load of bollox. I won't be reading the article thank-you.