LoveCity said:
HAHAHA, so we should be in 5th if all decisions were correct? I doubted that site last season, now it is just parody.
It is, I only gave it a quick glance to shut that stupid fan up. It looks as if City have had as many decisions on there as Spurs.
It's all opinions at the end of the day. The one against Reading if I remember Kyle turned his back and Ekotto was grabbing a shirt against Norwich, not much in it. Suarez's was no where near a penalty either. None of them affected the match in any way shape or form.
I only genuinely cry about reffing if it's shockingly bad like against Stoke last season or Clatternburg screwing us over against United.
These ones are just pathetic on the site.
It says Adebayor should have had a penalty against City. In my opinion no, but probably that poster will say it is too. Is he Alan Hansen?
-- Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:12 pm --
Van Persies left peg said:
Hahahahaha fair play :)
Must admit i do have a good laugh at those fans who come out with that claptrap of "all we want is the fair decisions" fuck off do you, we all want our rivals screwed over because it helps us just bloody admit it its so obvious, like you say you thought it was a great decision because it fucked over the team you hate and always want to lose, if i was you id agree, its the holier than thou lot that do my head in, just admit you want the ref to give the decisions in your favour and be done with it, we're all the same.
The truth is there is ZERO objectivity where football is concerned, a United fan and a city fan can sit and watch the same game and will see the same incident in 2 completely different ways, same all over the world.
Spot on. A slight fall by Balo will look like a penalty to a City fan but not to a United fan. Same with Nani falling over like a girl. The only ones that will give a foul are Foy, Clatternwank and Webb