The Tottenham Thread 12/13

FrostyNRG said:
Manc in London said:
I have watched him several times. He is struggling again tonight against Grant Holt. In purely defensive terms, Dawson is better IMO. I'm not a fan of Dawson either, although I have to say that when I met he came across as a good bloke.

I'm reserving judgement on Vertonghen for now. I think calling him the worst buy of the summer is very harsh, but equally I was somewhat surprised when I saw he was picked by a few pundits in their "team of the season so far". He's had some shockers, but he has showed some class in a few performances too. I'm hoping that being shifted between LB and CB all season is a big reason for his inconsistency and that he'll settle with a long run in the middle. I like to see a settled back four and AVB has changed it virtually every game, which I'm no fan of.

Dawson is a solid, but also limited, defender IMO, and I'm not sure he's quite good enough for a top 6 team. He is indeed a very pleasant young man though, and one of the most "down to earth" players I've met.

To be fair, being a regular in the Spurs team seems to be the only criteria for being in some pundits team of the week. The over rating of Spurs players by the media has become a popular pastime. If pundits and journalists were asked to name who they think are the best 5 FBs in the Prem, Naughton, Ekotto and Walker would all get more votes than Clichy. Even though Clichy is better than all three of them.

Dawson may not be a starter for a top 6 team but imagine Spurs have 10 mins to defend a one goal lead in order to qualify for the CL. Would you feel more confident with the Belgian or Dawson?<br /><br />-- Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:30 pm --<br /><br />RE teams of the season, I would have Nastasic ahead of him. But the Serbian rarely gets any plaudits.
 
Manc in London said:
To be fair, being a regular in the Spurs team seems to be the only criteria for being in some pundits team of the week. The over rating of Spurs players by the media has become a popular pastime. If pundits and journalists were asked to name who they think are the best 5 FBs in the Prem, Naughton, Ekotto and Walker would all get more votes than Clichy. Even though Clichy is better than all three of them.

Dawson may not be a starter for a top 6 team but imagine Spurs have 10 mins to defend a one goal lead in order to qualify for the CL. Would you feel more confident with the Belgian or Dawson?

You really think that our players are over-rated by the press? I don't tend to pay a huge amount of attention to the football press as a rule because it's by and large written by idiots, but that is not something I've ever picked up on at all. I know we were something of the darlings of the media for a while under Redknapp, and some of the superlatives bandied around about Bale are somewhat OTT, but I've never seen anything else to suggest that really. Walker really impressed me last season and was exciting to watch to be fair (although defensively suspect on several occasions) so I can understand why he got some good press then. Seems to have gone backwards this season and the little I have read in the press about him seems to support that.

Hard for me to be objective about an ex-Arsenal player if I'm being honest, but he's certainly a top player. Like many full-backs these days, I think his ability going forward is better than his defensive abilities, but I probably haven't seen enough of him to state that categorically.

Answering your question is a tough one, as Dawson tends to show his weaker moments when we are under pressure. Vertonghen strikes me as being something of a calmer individual. If pushed for an answer, I'd probably say Dawson - but I expect (hope?) that this time next year my answer would be different.
 
FrostyNRG said:
Manc in London said:
To be fair, being a regular in the Spurs team seems to be the only criteria for being in some pundits team of the week. The over rating of Spurs players by the media has become a popular pastime. If pundits and journalists were asked to name who they think are the best 5 FBs in the Prem, Naughton, Ekotto and Walker would all get more votes than Clichy. Even though Clichy is better than all three of them.

Dawson may not be a starter for a top 6 team but imagine Spurs have 10 mins to defend a one goal lead in order to qualify for the CL. Would you feel more confident with the Belgian or Dawson?

You really think that our players are over-rated by the press? I don't tend to pay a huge amount of attention to the football press as a rule because it's by and large written by idiots, but that is not something I've ever picked up on at all. I know we were something of the darlings of the media for a while under Redknapp, and some of the superlatives bandied around about Bale are somewhat OTT, but I've never seen anything else to suggest that really. Walker really impressed me last season and was exciting to watch to be fair (although defensively suspect on several occasions) so I can understand why he got some good press then. Seems to have gone backwards this season and the little I have read in the press about him seems to support that.

Hard for me to be objective about an ex-Arsenal player if I'm being honest, but he's certainly a top player. Like many full-backs these days, I think his ability going forward is better than his defensive abilities, but I probably haven't seen enough of him to state that categorically.

Answering your question is a tough one, as Dawson tends to show his weaker moments when we are under pressure. Vertonghen strikes me as being something of a calmer individual. If pushed for an answer, I'd probably say Dawson - but I expect (hope?) that this time next year my answer would be different.


You've obviously not seen Clichy enough this season, he's far better at defending.
 
Kun Aguero said:
You've obviously not seen Clichy enough this season, he's far better at defending.

I did quantify my comment by saying that, and you are in a far better position to judge that than me. Would you say there has been a noticable improvement in his defending during his time at City? I certainly believe my comment to be an accurate one based on his time at Arsenal.
 
Kun Aguero said:
Manc in London said:
Vertonghen is shockingly bad. Possibly the worst buy of the summer in the Prem.

I do find it funny that Spurs fans rate Ekotto so highly. Reading Spurs foruns, most fans of the club think he is the best LB in the prem. Can anyone name a worse starting LB in the Prem?


Ian Harte?

Oh come on he is decent just slower than a disabled crack addict on a methadone trip<br /><br />-- Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:11 am --<br /><br />
FrostyNRG said:
Kun Aguero said:
You've obviously not seen Clichy enough this season, he's far better at defending.

I did quantify my comment by saying that, and you are in a far better position to judge that than me. Would you say there has been a noticable improvement in his defending during his time at City? I certainly believe my comment to be an accurate one based on his time at Arsenal.

I would say he is one of the best defenders at the club easily, he has learnt a lot from Mancini's defensive coaches. In fact he is probably better at defending now than going forward
 
Manc in London said:
Vertonghen is shockingly bad. Possibly the worst buy of the summer in the Prem.

I do find it funny that Spurs fans rate Ekotto so highly. Reading Spurs foruns, most fans of the club think he is the best LB in the prem. Can anyone name a worse starting LB in the Prem?

Whoever Arsenal pick on any given day?
It could be Gibbs, it could be Jenkinson or it couls be Santos. If it's Santos then I'd put good money on Stephen Hawking being a better left back.
 
For all the criticism of Tottenham's defence, it should be noted that they've actually conceded two fewer goals than League leaders Manchester United.

And only four goals have been conceded in their last 9 Premier League matches - an unbeaten run since mid-December which has included five clean sheets.

On top of which, our first choice central defender Younes Kaboul is set to return after missing almost the entire season due to injury.
 
Don't mind Spurs under AVB, grown to thoroughly despise Monsieur Whinger and his merry fanboys, hope you seal the CL spot over them, after we twat you at WHL of course ;)
 
THFC6061 said:
For all the criticism of Tottenham's defence, it should be noted that they've actually conceded two fewer goals than League leaders Manchester United.

And they've scored 18 more goals than you. United's defensive record this season is not a benchmark of excellence. Their game plan has been to outgun the opposition and they've only just stabilised their defence to a respectable standard.
 
If we don't pull our finger out i can see the spuds finishing 2nd and us having a battle on are hands to be 4th or better. We don't want to finish 4th and then have to qualify, because our history in this comp aint good.
 
chris63 said:
If we don't pull our finger out i can see the spuds finishing 2nd and us having a battle on are hands to be 4th or better. We don't want to finish 4th and then have to qualify, because our history in this comp aint good.

Oh come on.

8 points ahead, our form is better than theirs (14 points from our last 6 against their 12 points).

Just like last year, not going to happen.
 
Castiel said:
THFC6061 said:
For all the criticism of Tottenham's defence, it should be noted that they've actually conceded two fewer goals than League leaders Manchester United.

And they've scored 18 more goals than you. United's defensive record this season is not a benchmark of excellence. Their game plan has been to outgun the opposition and they've only just stabilised their defence to a respectable standard.

Last 9 Premier League matches...

P0167_zps9b7b563e.png
 
THFC6061 said:
Castiel said:
THFC6061 said:
For all the criticism of Tottenham's defence, it should be noted that they've actually conceded two fewer goals than League leaders Manchester United.

And they've scored 18 more goals than you. United's defensive record this season is not a benchmark of excellence. Their game plan has been to outgun the opposition and they've only just stabilised their defence to a respectable standard.

Last 9 Premier League matches...

P0167_zps9b7b563e.png


What's that supposed to be proving?
 
without a dream said:
THFC6061 said:
Castiel said:
And they've scored 18 more goals than you. United's defensive record this season is not a benchmark of excellence. Their game plan has been to outgun the opposition and they've only just stabilised their defence to a respectable standard.

Last 9 Premier League matches...

P0167_zps9b7b563e.png


What's that supposed to be proving?

Pointless look at the league table not some selected matches
 
THFC6061 said:
Last 9 Premier League matches...

P0167_zps9b7b563e.png
As mentioned what does that prove? You can't take a cross section out of one week in December which happens to make United look defensively competent when they clearly weren't. You don't have to shamelessly manipulate statistics either. If you must statistically compare Tottenham's relative defensive record, compare it to City who have the best record in the league so far.
 
Castiel said:
THFC6061 said:
Last 9 Premier League matches...

P0167_zps9b7b563e.png
As mentioned what does that prove? You can't take a cross section out of one week in December which happens to make United look defensively competent when they clearly weren't. You don't have to shamelessly manipulate statistics either. If you must statistically compare Tottenham's relative defensive record, compare it to City who have the best record in the league so far.


Good lad Castiel.
 
chris63 said:
If we don't pull our finger out i can see the spuds finishing 2nd and us having a battle on are hands to be 4th or better. We don't want to finish 4th and then have to qualify, because our history in this comp aint good.



Hahaha
 
moomba said:
chris63 said:
If we don't pull our finger out i can see the spuds finishing 2nd and us having a battle on are hands to be 4th or better. We don't want to finish 4th and then have to qualify, because our history in this comp aint good.

Oh come on.

8 points ahead, our form is better than theirs (14 points from our last 6 against their 12 points).

Just like last year, not going to happen.

Some tricky games coming up and where not really setting the world on fire with our football atm.
 
THFC6061 said:
Castiel said:
THFC6061 said:
For all the criticism of Tottenham's defence, it should be noted that they've actually conceded two fewer goals than League leaders Manchester United.

And they've scored 18 more goals than you. United's defensive record this season is not a benchmark of excellence. Their game plan has been to outgun the opposition and they've only just stabilised their defence to a respectable standard.

Last 9 Premier League matches...

P0167_zps9b7b563e.png
That is a staggeringly stupid post, even by the standards of a Spurs fan. What does a nine game run prove? Sweet fuck all. At a guess (can't be bothered checking; I'll leave that to our resident anorak-clad Spur), I would guess that Reading would be comfortably in the top half of a ''last nine games'' form table. Does that then make them a top half team? Does it fuck. Sweet jesus. Lord knows I've posted some shite on here (and no doubt will again), but I don't think I've ever posted such nonsense as that post. THFC6061, you'll really excelled yourself this time.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top