You think problems would arise facing decent opposition with Fernando behind Yaya & Fernandinho? I'd argue that is simply our strongest defensive midfield available (Delph for Yaya perhaps); I believe it was the Sevilla away match (?) where we utilised this to great effect.I think going forwards, we'd be ok like that, it's facing any half decent team and we're on the back foot where the problems arise. I think KdB can do a decent DM job (even though he's primarily AM). I think Fernandinho is the opposite... he can be a decent AM, but primarily DM. So that's two we're ok with. I think Yaya and Fernando become the weak links. I think Yaya is just past it, and I don't think Fernando is good enough. If we could replace those two with quality players who can do both AM and DM well, we're ok.
But... there's some BIG names missing from that... No Silva, Navas, Nasri or Sterling.
If we want a solid midfield, some of those players are going to have to go, or we're going to end up with two distinct setups... the attacking setup and the defensive one. You could argue we have that now, but the defensive setup is still compromised by too many flair players and lack of proper DM's. We sometimes will say 'he's gone quite defensive' - because he's got Delph, or Fernando in with Yaya and Fernandinho, but in truth it's only a notional defensive setup... only one of those has much talent to operate in a truly defensive manner (Fernandinho).
Yes but those players minus Navas were injured yesterday, my suggestion was a replacement option on yesterdays starting 11 considering the players who were fit - and Navas only works when he has space, something he doesn't have when we play as slowly as yesterday with only 1 creative player on the pitch.
Maybe I'm misinterpreting but it sounds like you only want midfielders who play both a defensive & attacking role to a reasonable degree? Would have to disagree with that notion personally, would rather have experts in their natural positions rather than all rounders.