Theo Wallcott

hoillett and scott sinclair are better than him, so is nathan dyer. he would be mad to leave arsenal as no other team would accept his sh!tness
 
Calcio said:
hoillett and scott sinclair are better than him, so is nathan dyer. he would be mad to leave arsenal as no other team would accept his sh!tness
I agree about Hoillett but not so sure about Scott Sinclair, i haven't seen enough/much of Dyer outside of this season to be fair
 
Walcott, Downing, Young, Lennon, SWP, and Johnson, this generation's overrated English wingers... we seem to have hordes of wingers every generation who show great promise but never end up all that great (SWP has been one sadly).

Oxlade-Chamberlain shows the potential to be something other than the typical headless chicken English winger but then so did so many others. Waiting for England to produce a winger as good as Robben, Ribery, Nani, Bale, Di Maria, Navas, Pedro, or even 20-year-old Hazard.
 
oakiecokie said:
I`ve said it before,but Dyer from Swansea for me.
Reminds me of a young SWP with pace and the ability to beat a man.

So,that's twice you've been wrong about the same thing!
 
LoveCity said:
Walcott, Downing, Young, Lennon, SWP, and Johnson, this generation's overrated English wingers... we seem to have hordes of wingers every generation who show great promise but never end up all that great (SWP has been one sadly).

Oxlade-Chamberlain shows the potential to be something other than the typical headless chicken English winger but then so did so many others. Waiting for England to produce a winger as good as Robben, Ribery, Nani, Bale, Di Maria, Navas, Pedro, or even 20-year-old Hazard.
The difference between Chamberlain and those guys is that until 18 months ago Chamberlain was a central midfielder. he played all his youth days in southampton in the middle. he said himself it was only when he made his debut for the first team that he was told to play on the wing as they felt he was a bit too small to play in the middle so early.

Even wenger said he will end up as an attacking central midfielder and the times i seen him play for Arsenal, he comes inside alot and link up with others
 
des hardi said:
royle said:
I would take walcott,i am not sure if we need him right now though..
we will never need him....fast but braindead when it comes to football.

No, your right. We will never need him but I cant help but think how funny it would be that we've stolen another player from Wenger.

His head would explode!
We should at least publicly bid 140k per week for him just to watch Wengers reaction!
 
We really don't need Wallcott - great youngster but he really hasn't pushed on he's just a wastful and very irritating winger - they'd hate him on this board if he signed for us. No thank you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top