<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2544147/Manchester-United-slip-three-Bayern-Munich-knock-David-Moyes-boys-perch-Arsenal-Chelsea-Manchester-City-feature-football-rich-list.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -list.html</a>aguero93:20 said:link bb?BoyBlue_1985 said:That Ed Thompson cock womble has a little say in the dailymail that we have cashed in next seasons season tickets to make up our match day revenue
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, said: ‘It could be that they have taken out a mortgage against one year’s advance match day income. It is certainly a baffling figure.’
and can we get that **** back on here to explain that comment? does he know what goes into a statement of comprehensive income? fucking twat.
see, the stupid snakey little wankstains hasn't even taken the following factors into account:BoyBlue_1985 said:<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2544147/Manchester-United-slip-three-Bayern-Munich-knock-David-Moyes-boys-perch-Arsenal-Chelsea-Manchester-City-feature-football-rich-list.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -list.html</a>aguero93:20 said:link bb?BoyBlue_1985 said:That Ed Thompson cock womble has a little say in the dailymail that we have cashed in next seasons season tickets to make up our match day revenue
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, said: ‘It could be that they have taken out a mortgage against one year’s advance match day income. It is certainly a baffling figure.’
and can we get that **** back on here to explain that comment? does he know what goes into a statement of comprehensive income? fucking twat.
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, queried how commercial income could have increased so much last season. "It is certainly a baffling figure," he said. "There always looked like there had to be some kind of off-the-wall element to the figure, to mean that City complied with FFP."
He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, queried how commercial income could have increased so much last season. "It is certainly a baffling figure," he said. "There always looked like there had to be some kind of off-the-wall element to the figure, to mean that City complied with FFP."
aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, queried how commercial income could have increased so much last season. "It is certainly a baffling figure," he said. "There always looked like there had to be some kind of off-the-wall element to the figure, to mean that City complied with FFP."
aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, queried how commercial income could have increased so much last season. "It is certainly a baffling figure," he said. "There always looked like there had to be some kind of off-the-wall element to the figure, to mean that City complied with FFP."
'Poltroon' is a new one on me. Thanks stony :-)stony said:aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
He's a self proclaimed expert that was schooled by someone who actually knew what he was talking about when he came on here.
Like then, he doesn't have the backbone to admit he's wrong so he comes out with sly comments like "baffling figure"
I hope the club take him to task on this, I'm sick of hearing bitter little poltroons like him have digs at us in the press. The ill informed bollocks he's spouting is damaging, and will be reported as fact by the red tops.
Time for our lawyers to earn their money.
adrianr said:aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
Ahh is that the lad PB schooled? Who runs the FFPR website? Who refuses to admit when he's wrong?
Judging by his latest comments he's still bitter about the complete shafting he got on here. I wouldn't mind but from what I can gather he's no more than a jumped-up financial advisor, not even a qualified accountant.aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, queried how commercial income could have increased so much last season. "It is certainly a baffling figure," he said. "There always looked like there had to be some kind of off-the-wall element to the figure, to mean that City complied with FFP."
stony said:aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.moomba said:Ed is baffled
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/deloitte-football-money-league-report-manchester-citys-financial-fair-play-hopes-lifted-by-revenue-hike-9078607.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 78607.html</a>
He's a self proclaimed expert that was schooled by someone who actually knew what he was talking about when he came on here.
Like then, he doesn't have the backbone to admit he's wrong so he comes out with sly comments like "baffling figure"
I hope the club take him to task on this, I'm sick of hearing bitter little poltroons like him have digs at us in the press. The ill informed bollocks he's spouting is damaging, and will be reported as fact by the red tops.
Time for our lawyers to earn their money.
BoyBlue_1985 said:That Ed Thompson cock womble has a little say in the dailymail that we have cashed in next seasons season tickets to make up our match day revenue
Ed Thompson, the FFP commentator and analyst, said: ‘It could be that they have taken out a mortgage against one year’s advance match day income. It is certainly a baffling figure.’
no they fucking won't. I've complained to the daily mail and highlighted it as a possible libel issue, I've also told them I'm going to report them to press regulation and the club and I'm in the process of drafting those two e-mails atm. that **** is going to retract that, no self proclaimed 'ffp expert' is slandering my club in print and getting away with it.willipp said:stony said:aguero93:20 said:He was baffled when he came on here too.
He's a self proclaimed expert that was schooled by someone who actually knew what he was talking about when he came on here.
Like then, he doesn't have the backbone to admit he's wrong so he comes out with sly comments like "baffling figure"
I hope the club take him to task on this, I'm sick of hearing bitter little poltroons like him have digs at us in the press. The ill informed bollocks he's spouting is damaging, and will be reported as fact by the red tops.
Time for our lawyers to earn their money.
Thats what id love to see, our lawyers and experts to just disgrace this guy publicly for the fraud he is. He showed himself for what he is on here, but unfortuately all the outside pubic and media lap his lies up. He knows now he will be wrong about City meeting FFP, so he is now resorting to this to keep some kind of face.
I'm With Stupid said:Has anyone got a link to him appearing on this site?
aguero93:20 said:no they fucking won't. I've complained to the daily mail and highlighted it as a possible libel issue, I've also told them I'm going to report them to press regulation and the club and I'm in the process of drafting those two e-mails atm. that **** is going to retract that, no self proclaimed 'ffp expert' is slandering my club in print and getting away with it.willipp said:stony said:He's a self proclaimed expert that was schooled by someone who actually knew what he was talking about when he came on here.
Like then, he doesn't have the backbone to admit he's wrong so he comes out with sly comments like "baffling figure"
I hope the club take him to task on this, I'm sick of hearing bitter little poltroons like him have digs at us in the press. The ill informed bollocks he's spouting is damaging, and will be reported as fact by the red tops.
Time for our lawyers to earn their money.
Thats what id love to see, our lawyers and experts to just disgrace this guy publicly for the fraud he is. He showed himself for what he is on here, but unfortuately all the outside pubic and media lap his lies up. He knows now he will be wrong about City meeting FFP, so he is now resorting to this to keep some kind of face.
You expect me to wade through 61 pages? I'm far too lazy for that. Any idea what page he appeared?Matty said:I'm With Stupid said:Has anyone got a link to him appearing on this site?
Err, he appeared in THIS thread!!!!!!
Posted under the username ffplay.
Are you sure you're WITH stupid?
willipp said:aguero93:20 said:no they fucking won't. I've complained to the daily mail and highlighted it as a possible libel issue, I've also told them I'm going to report them to press regulation and the club and I'm in the process of drafting those two e-mails atm. that **** is going to retract that, no self proclaimed 'ffp expert' is slandering my club in print and getting away with it.willipp said:Thats what id love to see, our lawyers and experts to just disgrace this guy publicly for the fraud he is. He showed himself for what he is on here, but unfortuately all the outside pubic and media lap his lies up. He knows now he will be wrong about City meeting FFP, so he is now resorting to this to keep some kind of face.
Good, im glad someone with the knowledge and understanding of FFP is actually challenging this guy outside of BM. The mail obviously do not check the sources of this information and just take it as gospel.
I'm With Stupid said:You expect me to wade through 61 pages? I'm far too lazy for that. Any idea what page he appeared?Matty said:I'm With Stupid said:Has anyone got a link to him appearing on this site?
Err, he appeared in THIS thread!!!!!!
Posted under the username ffplay.
Are you sure you're WITH stupid?
Matty said:willipp said:aguero93:20 said:no they fucking won't. I've complained to the daily mail and highlighted it as a possible libel issue, I've also told them I'm going to report them to press regulation and the club and I'm in the process of drafting those two e-mails atm. that **** is going to retract that, no self proclaimed 'ffp expert' is slandering my club in print and getting away with it.
Good, im glad someone with the knowledge and understanding of FFP is actually challenging this guy outside of BM. The mail obviously do not check the sources of this information and just take it as gospel.
It's more likely the Mail don't care whether he's right or not. As long as something backs up their pre-determined position on a subject they'll print it, and on many occasions they'll simply make up facts and figures to "support" their position. You can't believe a single thing you read in the Daily Mail, it has been demonstrated time and time again that they simply make shit up.
-- Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:16 am --
I'm With Stupid said:You expect me to wade through 61 pages? I'm far too lazy for that. Any idea what page he appeared?Matty said:Err, he appeared in THIS thread!!!!!!
Posted under the username ffplay.
Are you sure you're WITH stupid?
No, however if you search by author using ffplay it'll find all his posts (only 29 of them). He only posted about FFP.
Is the right answer.willipp said:Matty said:willipp said:Good, im glad someone with the knowledge and understanding of FFP is actually challenging this guy outside of BM. The mail obviously do not check the sources of this information and just take it as gospel.
It's more likely the Mail don't care whether he's right or not. As long as something backs up their pre-determined position on a subject they'll print it, and on many occasions they'll simply make up facts and figures to "support" their position. You can't believe a single thing you read in the Daily Mail, it has been demonstrated time and time again that they simply make shit up.
-- Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:16 am --
I'm With Stupid said:You expect me to wade through 61 pages? I'm far too lazy for that. Any idea what page he appeared?
No, however if you search by author using ffplay it'll find all his posts (only 29 of them). He only posted about FFP.
Do we think the club actually care about these kind of comments and reports in the media? Surely they are aware of the media bias on this, but im presuming will just let the figures themselves do the talking rather than feel the need to publicly defend our finances against these kind of stories.