Castiel said:
Stoned Rose said:
There's absolutely no way any of those Chelsea players will be getting a bollocking.
It was men v boys and there was no need to exert themselves any more than they did. They were in complete control.
Mourinho is a slave driver! There was an unexplained drop in intensity. It obviously wasn't a major issue but I'm almost certain that isn't what Jose wanted them to do. It was basically complacency and that can kill you against better sides. He didn't do anything to suggest he wanted to close out the game at half time, no Mikel/Willian on early, no change in shape, we just went into cruise control and stopped with the quick incisive passing and darting runs into space presumably because the players felt the game was won. Jose will want them to be more ruthless until he makes the switch into closing it out.
Once I again I have to agree with Castiel. The drop in intensity won't have gone down well with Mourinho and he will be speaking to them about it.
EDIT
Also it was not all the players that dropped their intensity. It was certain players, which is why I think Mourinho won't be happy about it.
prestonibbo_mcfc said:
supercrystal7 said:
Looking to do down does not make it any less of a penalty. The attacking player has no reason to get out of the way if his opponent once to foul him. There is a difference between leaving your foot to be taken out and moving your foot into the opponent to initiate contact. A penalty every time for me.
No difference you are still initiating contact, whether it be from side front, back or upside down.
Maybe I did not explain myself well enough. It was the keeper that run int Costa. Yes Costa could have jumped over him, but the attack has obligation to get out of the way of a defender that commits himself rashly.
For a comparison the penalty Costa got against Holland in the world cup was an example of him initiating contact and leaving. We will have to agree to disagree.