Nervous Nedum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 808
Rascal said:malg said:Agree 100% with all of that. I can understand why some older fans will be dubious about everything, but I firmly believe that cycling tests more than any other sport. You're spot on about Sky as well, Murdoch has built his Sky TV platform on sport, and if the Sky team were involved in drug abuse it would be a real blow for them. As for the team throwing that second stage to 'throw people off the scent' - I don't buy into that.
Just off to watch the highlights now.
The Sky Sports thing in my opinion is the key. They have grown on the back of things such as the Premier League which is worth how many millions to them around the globe. Why would they sacrifice there integrity as a sports broadcaster by backing a team that cheats. Also if Team Sky do dope where does it place our Olympic achievements. In the whole grand scheme of things is it really worth losing all credibility for past achievements to win a race the team won last year anyway. It makes no sense to me
Froome was the best rider at the TdF last year but Wiggo won it as the plan went, so i find it odd that with Wiggo not being there people question Froomey. He finished second last year so if the winner is absent he is the favorite and best rider left.
you could say the same about us postal, discovery etc, everybody thought they were too big and had too much at stake to back dopers.
I really hope he's clean, but that performance on Saturday (because it was that good) was obviously going to raise suspicion in some quarters.