It seems a strange one that but there would be some irony if Pogba was to be badly injured in the course of such a loan and that Barca would possibly lose their outlay on him, and another thing, if he was to be transferred on such a basis, who would pay his wage anyway? Would it be like we seem to do with our loaned out players whereby we have to pay some of that players wage just to get them off the books?With talk of Barcelona signing Pogba and loaning him back to Juve it got me thinking a transfer ban should also mean you cannot negotiate or agree any deals for future purchase whist on a ban.
A ban should mean ban.
Thoughts?
I agree, but by being a major European footballing force, Barca will have a lot more friends to help them find a way around this idea than City would!Not sure on the wages part tbh, my feelings on this we could potentially miss out on a top player to a club who is under a banning order. I think the rules need adapting to cover no transfer negotiations or agreed future deals whilst under the ban.
Simple! They agree on a transfer fee with Juventus, agree on a package with Pogba and then add one/ half season's worth of that package to the transfer fee and ask Juventus to pay Pogba his wages for that period. Technically, Juventus will be the ones paying his wages but it will be Barcelona's money.It seems a strange one that but there would be some irony if Pogba was to be badly injured in the course of such a loan and that Barca would possibly lose their outlay on him, and another thing, if he was to be transferred on such a basis, who would pay his wage anyway? Would it be like we seem to do with our loaned out players whereby we have to pay some of that players wage just to get them off the books?
Not at all.Is it not similar to the Lampard fiasco?