Txiki Begiristain to leave role at end of season

Does anyone think it wasn’t Txiki’s decision? He either wasn’t getting the money from Khaldoon and Soriano, Txiki (and Pep ) wanted to bring in World class players, and he saw the writing on the wall. Or Khalddon and Soriano saw too many poor buys and £100mill’s wasted on disappointing players over the last 2 seasons, and decided Txiki needed changing, hence beginning in Viana.
 
Does anyone think it wasn’t Txiki’s decision? He either wasn’t getting the money from Khaldoon and Soriano, Txiki (and Pep ) wanted to bring in World class players, and he saw the writing on the wall. Or Khalddon and Soriano saw too many poor buys and £100mill’s wasted on disappointing players over the last 2 seasons, and decided Txiki needed changing, hence beginning in Viana.
It was always Txikis intention to retire at about 60. So there’s no conspiracy or plot from either side. We need to just accept he’s going & welcome his replacement - who the club have monitored & selected for good reasons.
 
Does anyone think it wasn’t Txiki’s decision? He either wasn’t getting the money from Khaldoon and Soriano, Txiki (and Pep ) wanted to bring in World class players, and he saw the writing on the wall. Or Khalddon and Soriano saw too many poor buys and £100mill’s wasted on disappointing players over the last 2 seasons, and decided Txiki needed changing, hence beginning in Viana.
Say that again !!
 
Doesn't matter a jot if the players we were meant to be interested in didn't want to join in the first place or not worth the fee the selling club is valuing their player at. Throwing money doesn't fix the issue either (the rags being prime example). We do need renforcements but it is identifying the right player is the issue.
 
Does anyone think it wasn’t Txiki’s decision? He either wasn’t getting the money from Khaldoon and Soriano, Txiki (and Pep ) wanted to bring in World class players, and he saw the writing on the wall. Or Khalddon and Soriano saw too many poor buys and £100mill’s wasted on disappointing players over the last 2 seasons, and decided Txiki needed changing, hence beginning in Viana.
I don't see how Txiki is the problem. He works as part of a group, the purse strings seem to have been tightened and maybe everyone at the top took their eye off it but I don't see it.

Fully fit, we still have a very good squad.

I just don't see a world where Txiki has been the reason we haven't signed X, Y or Z.
 
Does anyone think it wasn’t Txiki’s decision? He either wasn’t getting the money from Khaldoon and Soriano, Txiki (and Pep ) wanted to bring in World class players, and he saw the writing on the wall. Or Khalddon and Soriano saw too many poor buys and £100mill’s wasted on disappointing players over the last 2 seasons, and decided Txiki needed changing, hence beginning in Viana.
It was arrogance and trusting in Pep to find the marginal gains in the squad

No back up to your 35 year old right back , Pep will sort it
No back up striker , Pep will sort it
No legs in midfield …you get the idea
 
It was always Txikis intention to retire at about 60. So there’s no conspiracy or plot from either side. We need to just accept he’s going & welcome his replacement - who the club have monitored & selected for good reasons.
Fair enough.

But Txiki’s last two seasons have been poor. Prior to that, he was signing world class players.

Hopefully, Txiki will enjoy his retirement back in Spain. He leaves City with my best wishes and a thank you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.