UAP/UFO thread - Non-Human Intelligences

[MMA]

Ffs.
Our very own Jodrell bank tracked the whole mission to the moon, I'd subject you go an take a tour round there. There's also a disc placed on the moon that has a laser pointed at it to measure the increasing distance.

Firstly I've been many times to jodrell.

Secondly calm down mate.
Fuckin hell.

I literally said I'm 50 / 50..
I'm open to debate.

 

[Coatigan]

FFS!
The latest posters are excelling themselves in idiocy!

Genuine question, that I can't for the life of me figure out, why the hell does it bother you so much. I can't think of a single reason for a thread I would frequent so much just to repeatedly get infuriated by. I just don't get it.

Putting aside how wild some things posted are, if your starting point is that it is completely impossible and will never happen, just what is it you think you might occasionally find here?

 

[Marklr]

Are the people that don't believe man landed on the moon allowed to vote as well?

 

[Kirkstall Blue]

Are the people that don't believe man landed on the moon allowed to vote as well?

But before you do avail yourself of all the evidence for and against
Number one the space junk we left up there the Mars rover. Number two we left a simple instrument installed 50 years ago by Apollo 11. during their day on the Moon, Armstrong and Aldrin planted a lunar laser ranging retroreflector array on the surface.
It’s still operational today, and allows us to reflect lasers off of it and measure the distance to the Moon down to the centimetre. We simply couldn’t do this if we hadn’t visited the Moon
Number three the US flag still up there with the tracks of the astronauts
You could tell me why we didn’t go Mark?

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Genuine question, that I can't for the life of me figure out, why the hell does it bother you so much. I can't think of a single reason for a thread I would frequent so much just to repeatedly get infuriated by. I just don't get it.

Putting aside how wild some things posted are, if your starting point is that it is completely impossible and will never happen, just what is it you think you might occasionally find here?

I am staggered at the moronic idiocy of people in this thread
I will always challenge their cretinous claims just in case there is anyone reading it who thinks their brain dead, conspiracy, fact denying garbage has any credibility.
What sort of dickhead thinks this thread should be the preserve of ignorant morons?

 

[Coatigan]

I am staggered at the moronic idiocy of people in this thread
I will always challenge their cretinous claims just in case there is anyone reading it who thinks their brain dead, conspiracy, fact denying garbage has any credibility.
What sort of dickhead thinks this thread should be the preserve of ignorant morons?

Thanks. Do you sense check every single thread as a voice of reason?

And yes I have likely commented similar condemnation on other threads, not to sound hypocritical. But I don't think I have as persistently followed a thread I generally dismissed.

 

[MMA]

I am staggered at the moronic idiocy of people in this thread
I will always challenge their cretinous claims just in case there is anyone reading it who thinks their brain dead, conspiracy, fact denying garbage has any credibility.
What sort of dickhead thinks this thread should be the preserve of ignorant morons?

Wow.

What an arrogant cnut.

You can debate differences of opinion you know without being an aggressive tool.

If you don't agree with someone then voice your opinion in a respectful way without calling people dickheads , morons , idiots , ignorant, brain dead.

Challenge people but come on mate if you showed that attitude towards the wrong person it wouldn't be long before you looked like a shitting dog.

Be nice.

 

[tweety]

A thread ban would be appropriate, just slags people off.

 

[Damocles]

If I were an archaeology student right now and, for example, wanted to write an academic paper arguing that the findings at Göbekli Tepe belonged to an advanced civilization, most universities would try to block me—maybe all of them. I wouldn’t graduate. My academic career would be over.

This is absolutely 100% untrue and the only people who think like this have never actually contributed to academia.
If you had evidence of a new civilization to the standard that you could argue it in a journal, you'd be instantly world famous in your chosen field and would spend the next several decades funded out of your arse.

 

[Damocles]

Firstly I've been many times to jodrell.

Secondly calm down mate.
Fuckin hell.

I literally said I'm 50 / 50..
I'm open to debate.

In my experience, Moon landing deniers usually turn out to be Flat Earth skeptics who eventually warp into fundamentalist Christian creationists. It's a well trodden path.

You say you're open to debate but the topic you want to debate is undebatable. So my position is that we landed on the Moon. In this debate I have thousands of data points collected from research and space institutes all over the planet including physical data.
In the other position, you have to prove that something didn't happen. How is this possible? How do you prove something didn't happen?
So maybe you say NASA faked a photo? OK, let's say that for some reason you believe this, that still doesn't prove they didn't go to the Moon, it proves they faked a photo.

You don't need to debate to show that something didn't happen. You need to explain what did happen which explains every data point that we have from Moon rocks to laser pointing and satellite tracking. You need to explain all of that and what did happen that doesn't include landing on the Moon and how the evidence fits this. Because if this is one of those Kubrick on a soundstage bullshit things, you may as well say we didn't go to the Moon because the Moon isn't real